The future of tourism work: is technology a substitute for labour supply?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the future of work by asking the question, ‘is technology a substitute for labour supply?’ Using New Zealand as a case study, a scenario planning methodology was adopted that engaged with leading tourism stakeholders, as part of an Industry Transformation Plan (ITP) process. Four scenarios were constructed, as follows. Scenario 1: Robbie the Chef represents a world without human chefs, where production robots run the kitchen. Scenario 2: West World Holiday Park portrays a popular tourist attraction, offering indulgent experiences shaped by advanced robots. Scenario 3: Weekends Only is a scenario about tourism businesses’ constant struggle for labour, resulting in a smaller but more professional industry. Scenario 4: The Day We Ran Out of Chefs depicts the situation when tourism and hospitality become unsustainable because of labour shortages. The paper concludes with a conceptual framework, capturing the essences of the scenarios which advocates four modes of technological substitution for labour: replacement (full scale replacement occurs as machines are so advanced); experiences (technology creates new experiences); argumentation (applications of technology boost the productivity of workers); and redesign (the production of tourism is redesigned through technology to reduce costs).
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalCurrent Issues in Tourism
Early online date5 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished online - 5 Sept 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Scenario planning
  • future of work
  • New Zealand
  • future of tourism
  • technology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The future of tourism work: is technology a substitute for labour supply?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this