Abstract
Objective: In July 2023 a diverse group of international experts from academia, healthcare and medical technology/pharmacological companies gathered to discuss the current global landscape in the management of obesity, identify the clinical challenges healthcare systems are facing, and the gaps in scientific knowledge.
Approach: We proposed ways that the academia‐industry‐healthcare‐interface can be strengthened to offer solutions to these challenges and fill the gaps in knowledge.
Conclusion: We identified these five priorities for action: (1) Enhancing the academia‐healthcare‐industry collaboration in a way that prioritizes the patient with obesity and healthcare economic value. (2) Identifying reliable biomarkers and predictors of obesity treatment response to determine as early as possible whether a specific therapy is likely to work. (3) Defining specific and individualized treatment targets that take account of heterogeneity of obesity‐related complications risk, the presence of multimorbidity, and patient preference. (4) Addressing bias and discrimination against people with obesity amongst clinicians, health policy makers and the wider public. (5) Combining randomized controlled trial and cohort study data to apply next generation “machine learning” and “artificial intelligence” methods to large datasets that accelerates identification of factors associated with response heterogeneity and successful treatment response prediction.
Approach: We proposed ways that the academia‐industry‐healthcare‐interface can be strengthened to offer solutions to these challenges and fill the gaps in knowledge.
Conclusion: We identified these five priorities for action: (1) Enhancing the academia‐healthcare‐industry collaboration in a way that prioritizes the patient with obesity and healthcare economic value. (2) Identifying reliable biomarkers and predictors of obesity treatment response to determine as early as possible whether a specific therapy is likely to work. (3) Defining specific and individualized treatment targets that take account of heterogeneity of obesity‐related complications risk, the presence of multimorbidity, and patient preference. (4) Addressing bias and discrimination against people with obesity amongst clinicians, health policy makers and the wider public. (5) Combining randomized controlled trial and cohort study data to apply next generation “machine learning” and “artificial intelligence” methods to large datasets that accelerates identification of factors associated with response heterogeneity and successful treatment response prediction.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e70127 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-13 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Obesity Science and Practice |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 18 Mar 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 1 Apr 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 The Author(s). Obesity Science & Practice published by World Obesity and The Obesity Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Funding
The authors have nothing to report.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- obesity related misperceptions
- pharmacotherapy
- biology
- bariatric surgery
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Future of the Obesity Management Landscape: Challenges, Opportunities and Solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver