The ethics of non-intervention in a study of patients awaitingcoronary artery bypass surgery

Donna Fitzsimons, Toni McAloon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Nurses conducting clinical research frequently encounter ethicallychallenging situations that require careful analysis if the decisions taken are to be inthe best interests of participants, researchers and society. There is a lack of literaturewhich discusses the ethical aspects of the nurse’s role in clinical research studies.Aim. The aim of this paper is to discuss the ethical conflicts and decisions takenduring a combined qualitative and quantitative study of patients’ experiences whilstawaiting coronary bypass surgery.Discussion. Ethical conflict arose because, despite having gained ethics approval fora non-interventional study, the researcher became concerned for the health of someresearch participants, whose condition was observed to have deteriorated. During thecourse of the study four of the 70 participants died. As a result, changes to the originalresearch protocol were negotiated and subsequently the researcher intervened incases where participants’ clinical condition had worsened.Conclusion. Nurses conducting clinical research studies can face serious ethicaldilemmas, particularly if participants’ health is at risk. This paper demonstrates thepotential for both role conflict and role convergence in nursing research. We contendthat since the roles of researcher and clinician are not mutually exclusive, the interfacebetween the two requires further discussion. The paper may to help inform otherresearchers who struggle with the issue of non-intervention when presented with
LanguageEnglish
Pages359-402
JournalJournal of Advanced Nursing
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Ethics
Arteries
Research Personnel
Nurses
Research
Nursing Research
Decision Support Techniques
Nurse's Role
Health
Conflict (Psychology)
Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • nursing research
  • role conflict
  • ethics
  • coronary artery bypass surgery
  • waiting lists
  • mortality

Cite this

@article{0918bad692fb46c096c916d86d64cc6a,
title = "The ethics of non-intervention in a study of patients awaitingcoronary artery bypass surgery",
abstract = "Background. Nurses conducting clinical research frequently encounter ethicallychallenging situations that require careful analysis if the decisions taken are to be inthe best interests of participants, researchers and society. There is a lack of literaturewhich discusses the ethical aspects of the nurse’s role in clinical research studies.Aim. The aim of this paper is to discuss the ethical conflicts and decisions takenduring a combined qualitative and quantitative study of patients’ experiences whilstawaiting coronary bypass surgery.Discussion. Ethical conflict arose because, despite having gained ethics approval fora non-interventional study, the researcher became concerned for the health of someresearch participants, whose condition was observed to have deteriorated. During thecourse of the study four of the 70 participants died. As a result, changes to the originalresearch protocol were negotiated and subsequently the researcher intervened incases where participants’ clinical condition had worsened.Conclusion. Nurses conducting clinical research studies can face serious ethicaldilemmas, particularly if participants’ health is at risk. This paper demonstrates thepotential for both role conflict and role convergence in nursing research. We contendthat since the roles of researcher and clinician are not mutually exclusive, the interfacebetween the two requires further discussion. The paper may to help inform otherresearchers who struggle with the issue of non-intervention when presented with",
keywords = "nursing research, role conflict, ethics, coronary artery bypass surgery, waiting lists, mortality",
author = "Donna Fitzsimons and Toni McAloon",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03007.x",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "359--402",
journal = "Journal of Advanced Nursing",
issn = "0309-2402",
number = "4",

}

The ethics of non-intervention in a study of patients awaitingcoronary artery bypass surgery. / Fitzsimons, Donna; McAloon, Toni.

In: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2004, p. 359-402.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ethics of non-intervention in a study of patients awaitingcoronary artery bypass surgery

AU - Fitzsimons, Donna

AU - McAloon, Toni

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Background. Nurses conducting clinical research frequently encounter ethicallychallenging situations that require careful analysis if the decisions taken are to be inthe best interests of participants, researchers and society. There is a lack of literaturewhich discusses the ethical aspects of the nurse’s role in clinical research studies.Aim. The aim of this paper is to discuss the ethical conflicts and decisions takenduring a combined qualitative and quantitative study of patients’ experiences whilstawaiting coronary bypass surgery.Discussion. Ethical conflict arose because, despite having gained ethics approval fora non-interventional study, the researcher became concerned for the health of someresearch participants, whose condition was observed to have deteriorated. During thecourse of the study four of the 70 participants died. As a result, changes to the originalresearch protocol were negotiated and subsequently the researcher intervened incases where participants’ clinical condition had worsened.Conclusion. Nurses conducting clinical research studies can face serious ethicaldilemmas, particularly if participants’ health is at risk. This paper demonstrates thepotential for both role conflict and role convergence in nursing research. We contendthat since the roles of researcher and clinician are not mutually exclusive, the interfacebetween the two requires further discussion. The paper may to help inform otherresearchers who struggle with the issue of non-intervention when presented with

AB - Background. Nurses conducting clinical research frequently encounter ethicallychallenging situations that require careful analysis if the decisions taken are to be inthe best interests of participants, researchers and society. There is a lack of literaturewhich discusses the ethical aspects of the nurse’s role in clinical research studies.Aim. The aim of this paper is to discuss the ethical conflicts and decisions takenduring a combined qualitative and quantitative study of patients’ experiences whilstawaiting coronary bypass surgery.Discussion. Ethical conflict arose because, despite having gained ethics approval fora non-interventional study, the researcher became concerned for the health of someresearch participants, whose condition was observed to have deteriorated. During thecourse of the study four of the 70 participants died. As a result, changes to the originalresearch protocol were negotiated and subsequently the researcher intervened incases where participants’ clinical condition had worsened.Conclusion. Nurses conducting clinical research studies can face serious ethicaldilemmas, particularly if participants’ health is at risk. This paper demonstrates thepotential for both role conflict and role convergence in nursing research. We contendthat since the roles of researcher and clinician are not mutually exclusive, the interfacebetween the two requires further discussion. The paper may to help inform otherresearchers who struggle with the issue of non-intervention when presented with

KW - nursing research

KW - role conflict

KW - ethics

KW - coronary artery bypass surgery

KW - waiting lists

KW - mortality

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03007.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03007.x

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 359

EP - 402

JO - Journal of Advanced Nursing

T2 - Journal of Advanced Nursing

JF - Journal of Advanced Nursing

SN - 0309-2402

IS - 4

ER -