The ethics deficit in occupational safety and health monitoring technologies.

Ciaran Mc Aleenan, Philip McAleenan, Gerry Ayers, Michael Behm, Zach Beachem,

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Wearable and implantable technologies that enhance human capacity have opened up new opportunities to go beyond the replacement of lost capabilities to the provision of capacities to predict and potentially influence individual behaviour. Technologies, currently present on construction sites, either monitor location and transmit safety, health and well-being information to a central point or gather bioinformation on workers that can be read and interpreted to determine the physical and psychological stress states and ostensibly predict what may happen to the workers or how they may behave next; improving efficiencies. However, what appears absent is a sufficient exploration of the ethics underpinning the research and the morality in the application of these technologies in the industry, which may go well beyond the intent of the originators of the technology. Research into wearable and implantable technologies must take into consideration the broader impacts of the societal application of the work in the context of respect and equal consideration. This paper discusses how an international exercise, carried out to determine the extent to which researchers and contracting companies have examined the ethical and moral implications of the use of these technologies, discovered deficits in considering the impacts on worker competence, agency and reciprocity.
LanguageEnglish
Article number1800027
Pages1-8
Number of pages8
JournalProceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law
Volume172
Issue number2
Early online date18 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Health
Monitoring
Technology monitoring
Occupational safety and health
Industry
Workers

Keywords

  • Corporate Responsibility
  • Health & Safety
  • Information Technology

Cite this

@article{6baa0bbc1dad46b28acdcde7fe4076ca,
title = "The ethics deficit in occupational safety and health monitoring technologies.",
abstract = "Wearable and implantable technologies that enhance human capacity have opened up new opportunities to go beyond the replacement of lost capabilities to the provision of capacities to predict and potentially influence individual behaviour. Technologies, currently present on construction sites, either monitor location and transmit safety, health and well-being information to a central point or gather bioinformation on workers that can be read and interpreted to determine the physical and psychological stress states and ostensibly predict what may happen to the workers or how they may behave next; improving efficiencies. However, what appears absent is a sufficient exploration of the ethics underpinning the research and the morality in the application of these technologies in the industry, which may go well beyond the intent of the originators of the technology. Research into wearable and implantable technologies must take into consideration the broader impacts of the societal application of the work in the context of respect and equal consideration. This paper discusses how an international exercise, carried out to determine the extent to which researchers and contracting companies have examined the ethical and moral implications of the use of these technologies, discovered deficits in considering the impacts on worker competence, agency and reciprocity.",
keywords = "Corporate Responsibility, Health & Safety, Information Technology",
author = "{Mc Aleenan}, Ciaran and Philip McAleenan and Gerry Ayers and Michael Behm and Zach Beachem",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1680/jmapl.18.00027",
language = "English",
volume = "172",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Proceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law",
issn = "1751-4304",
number = "2",

}

The ethics deficit in occupational safety and health monitoring technologies. /.

In: Proceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law, Vol. 172, No. 2, 1800027, 18.10.2018, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ethics deficit in occupational safety and health monitoring technologies.

AU - Mc Aleenan, Ciaran

AU - McAleenan, Philip

AU - Ayers, Gerry

AU - Behm, Michael

AU - Beachem, Zach

PY - 2018/10/18

Y1 - 2018/10/18

N2 - Wearable and implantable technologies that enhance human capacity have opened up new opportunities to go beyond the replacement of lost capabilities to the provision of capacities to predict and potentially influence individual behaviour. Technologies, currently present on construction sites, either monitor location and transmit safety, health and well-being information to a central point or gather bioinformation on workers that can be read and interpreted to determine the physical and psychological stress states and ostensibly predict what may happen to the workers or how they may behave next; improving efficiencies. However, what appears absent is a sufficient exploration of the ethics underpinning the research and the morality in the application of these technologies in the industry, which may go well beyond the intent of the originators of the technology. Research into wearable and implantable technologies must take into consideration the broader impacts of the societal application of the work in the context of respect and equal consideration. This paper discusses how an international exercise, carried out to determine the extent to which researchers and contracting companies have examined the ethical and moral implications of the use of these technologies, discovered deficits in considering the impacts on worker competence, agency and reciprocity.

AB - Wearable and implantable technologies that enhance human capacity have opened up new opportunities to go beyond the replacement of lost capabilities to the provision of capacities to predict and potentially influence individual behaviour. Technologies, currently present on construction sites, either monitor location and transmit safety, health and well-being information to a central point or gather bioinformation on workers that can be read and interpreted to determine the physical and psychological stress states and ostensibly predict what may happen to the workers or how they may behave next; improving efficiencies. However, what appears absent is a sufficient exploration of the ethics underpinning the research and the morality in the application of these technologies in the industry, which may go well beyond the intent of the originators of the technology. Research into wearable and implantable technologies must take into consideration the broader impacts of the societal application of the work in the context of respect and equal consideration. This paper discusses how an international exercise, carried out to determine the extent to which researchers and contracting companies have examined the ethical and moral implications of the use of these technologies, discovered deficits in considering the impacts on worker competence, agency and reciprocity.

KW - Corporate Responsibility

KW - Health & Safety

KW - Information Technology

U2 - 10.1680/jmapl.18.00027

DO - 10.1680/jmapl.18.00027

M3 - Article

VL - 172

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Proceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law

T2 - Proceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law

JF - Proceedings of the ICE - Management, Procurement and Law

SN - 1751-4304

IS - 2

M1 - 1800027

ER -