The effectiveness of online psychotherapy interventions for the treatment of perinatal mental health disorders: A systematic review

Rachel Black, Marlene Sinclair, Paul Miller, Bernie Reid, Julie Mc Cullough, Paul F Slater, Mara Tesler Stein, Derek Farell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

246 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: There is a wide spectrum of perinatal mental health (PMH) disorders including anxiety, depression, stress, compulsive disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), mania and postpartum psychosis. Up to 20 per cent of women are found to be suffering from anxiety and or depression during pregnancy and the first three months postnatally. Maternal mental health can have an impact on the infant both antenatally and throughout the life course, with social, emotional and cognitive consequences. Therefore, there is a critical need for evidence-based interventions which address PMH disorders. At present, cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing therapy (EMDR) are the most commonly used therapies. They remain the only psychotherapies for PTSD in the perinatal period approved by The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE 2014). Objective: To assess the effectiveness of online psychotherapy (O-P-T) interventions for the treatment of PMH disorders. Methods: To address the research question ‘What is the effectiveness of online psychotherapy interventions for the treatment of perinatal mental health disorders?’ the researchers developed eligibility criteria using the Cochrane PICOS framework. Five electronic databases were searched: PsycInfo, MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses and Scopus, along with Google Scholar and the Shapiro Library, to identify papers which investigated O-P-T interventions published before July 2020. Interventions were included if study participants had a clinician-assessed diagnosis of a PMH illness at screening and if the study had an experimental design with clinician involvement as part of the intervention. The included studies were assessed for quality using the standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields (QualSyst) (Kmet et al 2004). Findings: Searches yielded 2567 results from the selected databases. Five studies were included in the review (209 participants), three were postnatal depression (PND) interventions and two were antenatal depression (AD) interventions. All were CBT-based. Quality ratings of the included studies were found to be high based on QualSyst scores, however treatment fidelity was not reported. Pooled effect sizes found a small to medium effect favouring the intervention versus control on the reduction of depressive symptoms, according to their score on the selected depression measures, and in some cases remission (d=0.48, 95% CI-0.07, 1.06). The results from the pooled effect sizes on available within-group data resulted in a large treatment effect for depression, anxiety and stress outcomes (d=1.90; d=0.81; d=1.05). Attrition rates were comparable with other online psychotherapy studies for mental health. Conclusions: This review provides evidence that O-P-T interventions for the treatment of PMH disorders are effective in improving clinical outcomes in the reduction of depression, anxiety and stress. Despite NICE (2014) recommendations for the treatment of PTSD in the perinatal period there remains a gap in the literature for online EMDR interventions. In addition, there is a lack of research for O-P-T interventions delivered via different modalities, such as videoconferencing, and a scarcity of research into O-P-T for other PMH disorders. This is the first synthesis of research into O-P-T for women who meet diagnostic criteria for PMH disorders as classified by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) (World Health Organization (WHO) 2020) or the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) (American Psychiatric Association 2013).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6-18
Number of pages13
JournalEvidence Based Midwifery
Volume19
Issue number1
Early online date1 Mar 2021
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 1 Mar 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Royal College of Midwives. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • EMDR
  • Evidence based midwifery
  • Interventions
  • Mental health
  • Online
  • Perinatal
  • Psychotherapy
  • Systematic review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effectiveness of online psychotherapy interventions for the treatment of perinatal mental health disorders: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this