Abstract
Order judgements are slower and less accurate when reversed. That is, when participants see two events in a sequence (e.g., circle …square), they are quicker to report ‘Before’ statements (e.g., “Circle before Square”) than ‘After’ statements (“Square after Circle”). The current study sought to determine whether a reversal effect will also occur when participants are instructed to produce a sequence of responses. Twenty participants were trained to criterion on simple ‘Before’ and ‘After’ instructions that specified sequences of two responses (e.g., “Circle before Square”). In a subsequent test, participants produced instructed sequences (e.g., circle … square) more quickly and more reliably when instructed to choose one stimulus before another than when they were requested to choose one stimulus after another. The implications of these findings for current theories of relational responding are considered.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 311-319 |
Journal | The Psychological Record |
Volume | 64 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 2 Apr 2014 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 30 Jun 2014 |
Keywords
- Before
- After
- Sequential responding
- Temporal instructions
- Relational responding
- Mutual entailment
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Effect of Before and After Instructions on the Speed of Sequential Responding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Julian Leslie
- School of Psychology - Professor of Psychology
- Faculty Of Life & Health Sciences - Full Professor
Person: Academic