The ecological impact of rural building on habitats in an agricultural landscape

Paul McKenzie, Alan Cooper, Thomas McCann, David Rogers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The impact of rural building on the type, area and distribution pattern of habitats in a hedged grassland landscape is assessed from a field-mapped survey of a random sample of 25 ha grid squares (1998 and 2007). Buildings covered 4.0% of Northern Ireland in 1998 increasing by 30.4% to 5.2% in 2007. The number, area and edge density of building patches also increased. Building was predominantly on productive agricultural grassland. A relatively small area but wide range of other habitats was built over, in particular broadleaf seminatural woodland and species-rich grassland habitats, specified by the European Habitats Directive as important for their biodiversity. Building on habitats such as wetland, bog and heath, associated with biophysical land use constraints, was much less. Building followed a simple area-proportional model in which habitats with the greatest area were proportionately more built over. The impact of building next to existing buildings and at isolated sites followed a similar pattern. The current land use planning policy and practice does not adequately protect habitats. This paper highlights the importance of implementing a consistent rural development strategy across government sectors to facilitate habitat protection and the ecosystem services they provide.
LanguageEnglish
Pages262 - 268
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
Volume101
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

ecological impact
agricultural land
habitat
grassland
bog
land use planning
development strategy
rural development
ecosystem service
field survey
woodland
wetland
biodiversity
land use

Keywords

  • Rural development
  • Spatial metrics
  • Field survey
  • GIS

Cite this

@article{76615a5c84a04d4c87bc0108c36af615,
title = "The ecological impact of rural building on habitats in an agricultural landscape",
abstract = "The impact of rural building on the type, area and distribution pattern of habitats in a hedged grassland landscape is assessed from a field-mapped survey of a random sample of 25 ha grid squares (1998 and 2007). Buildings covered 4.0{\%} of Northern Ireland in 1998 increasing by 30.4{\%} to 5.2{\%} in 2007. The number, area and edge density of building patches also increased. Building was predominantly on productive agricultural grassland. A relatively small area but wide range of other habitats was built over, in particular broadleaf seminatural woodland and species-rich grassland habitats, specified by the European Habitats Directive as important for their biodiversity. Building on habitats such as wetland, bog and heath, associated with biophysical land use constraints, was much less. Building followed a simple area-proportional model in which habitats with the greatest area were proportionately more built over. The impact of building next to existing buildings and at isolated sites followed a similar pattern. The current land use planning policy and practice does not adequately protect habitats. This paper highlights the importance of implementing a consistent rural development strategy across government sectors to facilitate habitat protection and the ecosystem services they provide.",
keywords = "Rural development, Spatial metrics, Field survey, GIS",
author = "Paul McKenzie and Alan Cooper and Thomas McCann and David Rogers",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.031",
language = "English",
volume = "101",
pages = "262 -- 268",
journal = "Landscape and Urban Planning",
issn = "0169-2046",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

The ecological impact of rural building on habitats in an agricultural landscape. / McKenzie, Paul; Cooper, Alan; McCann, Thomas; Rogers, David.

In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 101, No. 3, 2011, p. 262 - 268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ecological impact of rural building on habitats in an agricultural landscape

AU - McKenzie, Paul

AU - Cooper, Alan

AU - McCann, Thomas

AU - Rogers, David

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The impact of rural building on the type, area and distribution pattern of habitats in a hedged grassland landscape is assessed from a field-mapped survey of a random sample of 25 ha grid squares (1998 and 2007). Buildings covered 4.0% of Northern Ireland in 1998 increasing by 30.4% to 5.2% in 2007. The number, area and edge density of building patches also increased. Building was predominantly on productive agricultural grassland. A relatively small area but wide range of other habitats was built over, in particular broadleaf seminatural woodland and species-rich grassland habitats, specified by the European Habitats Directive as important for their biodiversity. Building on habitats such as wetland, bog and heath, associated with biophysical land use constraints, was much less. Building followed a simple area-proportional model in which habitats with the greatest area were proportionately more built over. The impact of building next to existing buildings and at isolated sites followed a similar pattern. The current land use planning policy and practice does not adequately protect habitats. This paper highlights the importance of implementing a consistent rural development strategy across government sectors to facilitate habitat protection and the ecosystem services they provide.

AB - The impact of rural building on the type, area and distribution pattern of habitats in a hedged grassland landscape is assessed from a field-mapped survey of a random sample of 25 ha grid squares (1998 and 2007). Buildings covered 4.0% of Northern Ireland in 1998 increasing by 30.4% to 5.2% in 2007. The number, area and edge density of building patches also increased. Building was predominantly on productive agricultural grassland. A relatively small area but wide range of other habitats was built over, in particular broadleaf seminatural woodland and species-rich grassland habitats, specified by the European Habitats Directive as important for their biodiversity. Building on habitats such as wetland, bog and heath, associated with biophysical land use constraints, was much less. Building followed a simple area-proportional model in which habitats with the greatest area were proportionately more built over. The impact of building next to existing buildings and at isolated sites followed a similar pattern. The current land use planning policy and practice does not adequately protect habitats. This paper highlights the importance of implementing a consistent rural development strategy across government sectors to facilitate habitat protection and the ecosystem services they provide.

KW - Rural development

KW - Spatial metrics

KW - Field survey

KW - GIS

U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.031

DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.031

M3 - Article

VL - 101

SP - 262

EP - 268

JO - Landscape and Urban Planning

T2 - Landscape and Urban Planning

JF - Landscape and Urban Planning

SN - 0169-2046

IS - 3

ER -