Abstract
In the context of current clinical practice guidance, this paper will analyse the role of GPs in decision-making about the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) using the concept of pharmaceuticalisation. Drawing on thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews with 20 GPs, the paper argues that the way GPs approach CVD pharmaceuticalisation is shaped by their understandings of and use of guidelines (and the knowledge they embody), existing treatment perspectives and the moral qualities of preventative treatment, and professional evaluations of ‘relevant’ information. The analysis indicates that there exist disparate and distinct approaches to and understandings of CVD pharmaceuticalisation amongst GPs. Depending on how knowledge, treatment perspectives and values variously combine, GPs sit somewhere on a spectrum of how pharmaceuticalised they are in terms of the approaches to and understandings of the prevention of CVD.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 650997 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-14 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Frontiers in Sociology |
| Volume | 6 |
| Early online date | 21 May 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published online - 21 May 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© Copyright © 2021 Douglass and Calnan.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Sociology
- pharmaceuticalisation
- statins
- cardiovascular disease
- clinical practice guidelines
- general practitioners
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Disparate Approaches of General Practitioners to the Pharmaceuticalisation of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver