The Craft of Public Administration in Eurasia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In an innovative approach, applied to a region of the world on which research remains in its infancy, this article identifies the dominant administrative reform traditions embedded within the administrative elites responsible for administrative reform in Eurasia. Our contribution is twofold. Firstly, we establish a mechanism for measuring bureaucrat perceptions of administrative reform that may be replicated in other regions, by identifying the extent to which the three dominant Western traditions of public service (traditional public administration, new public management and new public governance) have been embedded in Eurasian societies. The article thereby demonstrates the effectiveness of these turns in public administration to be ‘learned’ and become embedded within the psyche of elite-level bureaucrats in these Eurasian post-Soviet regimes. The article posits that, while members of these elites hold several common governance perceptions, understanding of administrative reform differs markedly between bureaucrats and is broadly aligned with various aspects of the three dominant turns in public administration. Therefore, it is recommended that some rebalancing needs to take place between international/regional public policy interventions and public administration interventions. While public policy interventions are of course required, the administrative foundations upon which they are built (or learned), require greater attention to the needs, skills and attitudes of practitioners.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1
Number of pages34
JournalPublic Policy and Administration
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2019

Fingerprint

public administration
reform
elite
public policy
governance
psyche
New Public Management
public service
regime
society

Keywords

  • Administrative reform
  • New Public Management
  • Eurasia
  • Q Methodology
  • Central Asia
  • Governance
  • Traditional Public Administration
  • new public management
  • traditional public administration
  • governance

Cite this

@article{70e49e72713141a9bdd0357636e16d7f,
title = "The Craft of Public Administration in Eurasia",
abstract = "In an innovative approach, applied to a region of the world on which research remains in its infancy, this article identifies the dominant administrative reform traditions embedded within the administrative elites responsible for administrative reform in Eurasia. Our contribution is twofold. Firstly, we establish a mechanism for measuring bureaucrat perceptions of administrative reform that may be replicated in other regions, by identifying the extent to which the three dominant Western traditions of public service (traditional public administration, new public management and new public governance) have been embedded in Eurasian societies. The article thereby demonstrates the effectiveness of these turns in public administration to be ‘learned’ and become embedded within the psyche of elite-level bureaucrats in these Eurasian post-Soviet regimes. The article posits that, while members of these elites hold several common governance perceptions, understanding of administrative reform differs markedly between bureaucrats and is broadly aligned with various aspects of the three dominant turns in public administration. Therefore, it is recommended that some rebalancing needs to take place between international/regional public policy interventions and public administration interventions. While public policy interventions are of course required, the administrative foundations upon which they are built (or learned), require greater attention to the needs, skills and attitudes of practitioners.",
keywords = "Administrative reform, New Public Management, Eurasia, Q Methodology, Central Asia, Governance, Traditional Public Administration, new public management, traditional public administration, governance",
author = "Karl O'Connor and Paul Carmichael",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1177/0952076719852416",
language = "English",
pages = "1",
journal = "Public Policy and Administration",
issn = "0952-0767",

}

The Craft of Public Administration in Eurasia. / O'Connor, Karl; Carmichael, Paul.

In: Public Policy and Administration, 31.05.2019, p. 1.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Craft of Public Administration in Eurasia

AU - O'Connor, Karl

AU - Carmichael, Paul

PY - 2019/5/31

Y1 - 2019/5/31

N2 - In an innovative approach, applied to a region of the world on which research remains in its infancy, this article identifies the dominant administrative reform traditions embedded within the administrative elites responsible for administrative reform in Eurasia. Our contribution is twofold. Firstly, we establish a mechanism for measuring bureaucrat perceptions of administrative reform that may be replicated in other regions, by identifying the extent to which the three dominant Western traditions of public service (traditional public administration, new public management and new public governance) have been embedded in Eurasian societies. The article thereby demonstrates the effectiveness of these turns in public administration to be ‘learned’ and become embedded within the psyche of elite-level bureaucrats in these Eurasian post-Soviet regimes. The article posits that, while members of these elites hold several common governance perceptions, understanding of administrative reform differs markedly between bureaucrats and is broadly aligned with various aspects of the three dominant turns in public administration. Therefore, it is recommended that some rebalancing needs to take place between international/regional public policy interventions and public administration interventions. While public policy interventions are of course required, the administrative foundations upon which they are built (or learned), require greater attention to the needs, skills and attitudes of practitioners.

AB - In an innovative approach, applied to a region of the world on which research remains in its infancy, this article identifies the dominant administrative reform traditions embedded within the administrative elites responsible for administrative reform in Eurasia. Our contribution is twofold. Firstly, we establish a mechanism for measuring bureaucrat perceptions of administrative reform that may be replicated in other regions, by identifying the extent to which the three dominant Western traditions of public service (traditional public administration, new public management and new public governance) have been embedded in Eurasian societies. The article thereby demonstrates the effectiveness of these turns in public administration to be ‘learned’ and become embedded within the psyche of elite-level bureaucrats in these Eurasian post-Soviet regimes. The article posits that, while members of these elites hold several common governance perceptions, understanding of administrative reform differs markedly between bureaucrats and is broadly aligned with various aspects of the three dominant turns in public administration. Therefore, it is recommended that some rebalancing needs to take place between international/regional public policy interventions and public administration interventions. While public policy interventions are of course required, the administrative foundations upon which they are built (or learned), require greater attention to the needs, skills and attitudes of practitioners.

KW - Administrative reform

KW - New Public Management

KW - Eurasia

KW - Q Methodology

KW - Central Asia

KW - Governance

KW - Traditional Public Administration

KW - new public management

KW - traditional public administration

KW - governance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066840565&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0952076719852416

DO - 10.1177/0952076719852416

M3 - Article

SP - 1

JO - Public Policy and Administration

T2 - Public Policy and Administration

JF - Public Policy and Administration

SN - 0952-0767

ER -