Abstract
Increasingly, state crime scholarship frames criminality as a social property that attaches to particular illegitimate state practices through a mediated process of struggle from below. Building on this foundation, the following paper presents a comparative study of two cases – using a range of primary materials – where sabotage was deployed by social movements to dramatically stigmatise illegitimate state-corporate conduct. In order to understand the symbolic and practical significance of this exchange, a theory of indifference will be developed. It will be argued that in the cases observed sabotage acted as a device which social movements could employ to impose a sense of consequence on organisational actors otherwise indifferent to, and alienated from, the significant harms their operations’ produced.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 514 |
Number of pages | 533 |
Journal | Theoretical Criminology |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 28 Oct 2015 |
Keywords
- corporate crime
- ecocide
- human rights
- Marxism
- resistance
- sabotage
- state-corporate crime
- state crime
- war crimes