The barbarism of indifference: Sabotage, resistance and state−corporate crime

Kristian Lasslett, Penny Green, Dawid Stańczak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Increasingly, state crime scholarship frames criminality as a social property that attaches to particular illegitimate state practices through a mediated process of struggle from below. Building on this foundation, the following article presents a comparative study of two cases—using a range of primary materials—where sabotage was deployed by social movements to stigmatize, dramatically, illegitimate state–corporate conduct. In order to understand the symbolic and practical significance of this exchange, a theory of indifference will be developed. It will be argued that in the cases observed sabotage acted as a device which social movements could employ to impose a sense of consequence on organizational actors otherwise indifferent to, and alienated from, the significant harms their operations’ produced.
LanguageEnglish
Pages514-533
JournalTheoretical Criminology
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2014

Fingerprint

barbarism
sabotage
Social Movements
offense
Criminality

Keywords

  • corporate crime
  • ecocide
  • human rights
  • Marxism
  • resistance
  • sabotage
  • state–
  • state crime
  • war crimes

Cite this

Lasslett, Kristian ; Green, Penny ; Stańczak, Dawid. / The barbarism of indifference: Sabotage, resistance and state−corporate crime. In: Theoretical Criminology. 2014 ; Vol. 19, No. 4. pp. 514-533.
@article{78df88e4d91b4f2cb7a2f6f51e896f42,
title = "The barbarism of indifference: Sabotage, resistance and state−corporate crime",
abstract = "Increasingly, state crime scholarship frames criminality as a social property that attaches to particular illegitimate state practices through a mediated process of struggle from below. Building on this foundation, the following article presents a comparative study of two cases—using a range of primary materials—where sabotage was deployed by social movements to stigmatize, dramatically, illegitimate state–corporate conduct. In order to understand the symbolic and practical significance of this exchange, a theory of indifference will be developed. It will be argued that in the cases observed sabotage acted as a device which social movements could employ to impose a sense of consequence on organizational actors otherwise indifferent to, and alienated from, the significant harms their operations’ produced.",
keywords = "corporate crime, ecocide, human rights, Marxism, resistance, sabotage, state–, state crime, war crimes",
author = "Kristian Lasslett and Penny Green and Dawid Stańczak",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1177/1362480614558866",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "514--533",
journal = "Theoretical Criminology",
issn = "1362-4806",
number = "4",

}

The barbarism of indifference: Sabotage, resistance and state−corporate crime. / Lasslett, Kristian; Green, Penny; Stańczak, Dawid.

In: Theoretical Criminology, Vol. 19, No. 4, 17.11.2014, p. 514-533.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The barbarism of indifference: Sabotage, resistance and state−corporate crime

AU - Lasslett, Kristian

AU - Green, Penny

AU - Stańczak, Dawid

PY - 2014/11/17

Y1 - 2014/11/17

N2 - Increasingly, state crime scholarship frames criminality as a social property that attaches to particular illegitimate state practices through a mediated process of struggle from below. Building on this foundation, the following article presents a comparative study of two cases—using a range of primary materials—where sabotage was deployed by social movements to stigmatize, dramatically, illegitimate state–corporate conduct. In order to understand the symbolic and practical significance of this exchange, a theory of indifference will be developed. It will be argued that in the cases observed sabotage acted as a device which social movements could employ to impose a sense of consequence on organizational actors otherwise indifferent to, and alienated from, the significant harms their operations’ produced.

AB - Increasingly, state crime scholarship frames criminality as a social property that attaches to particular illegitimate state practices through a mediated process of struggle from below. Building on this foundation, the following article presents a comparative study of two cases—using a range of primary materials—where sabotage was deployed by social movements to stigmatize, dramatically, illegitimate state–corporate conduct. In order to understand the symbolic and practical significance of this exchange, a theory of indifference will be developed. It will be argued that in the cases observed sabotage acted as a device which social movements could employ to impose a sense of consequence on organizational actors otherwise indifferent to, and alienated from, the significant harms their operations’ produced.

KW - corporate crime

KW - ecocide

KW - human rights

KW - Marxism

KW - resistance

KW - sabotage

KW - state–

KW - state crime

KW - war crimes

U2 - 10.1177/1362480614558866

DO - 10.1177/1362480614558866

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 514

EP - 533

JO - Theoretical Criminology

T2 - Theoretical Criminology

JF - Theoretical Criminology

SN - 1362-4806

IS - 4

ER -