Abstract
Despite extensive research on attainment grouping, the impact of attainment grouping on pupil attainment remains poorly understood and contested. This paper presents evidence from a study conducted with 2944 12–13 year olds, from 76 schools in England, who were allocated to between‐class attainment groups (‘setting’) in English and mathematics over the first 2 years of secondary schooling. After controlling for prior attainment, pupils in the top set performed significantly better than pupils in the middle and bottom sets in both English and mathematics. The findings indicate a widening gap in attainment, especially in the case of English. Findings, especially in the case of mathematics, provide more evidence of a relative benefit for pupils placed in top sets than a relative detriment for those in bottom sets.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 209-230 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | British Educational Research Journal |
Volume | 49 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 20 Sept 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published online - 20 Sept 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research was funded by the Education Endowment Foundation (EEF).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. British Educational Research Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Educational Research Association.
Keywords
- achievement gap
- attainment grouping
- mathematics
- tracking