Abstract
Background
Background
Kidscreen-27 was developed as part of a cross-cultural European Union-funded project to standardise the measurement of children’s health-related quality of life. Yet, research has reported mixed evidence for the hypothesised 5-factor model, and no confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) has been conducted on the instrument with children of low socio-economic status (SES) across Ireland (Northern and Republic).
Method
The data for this study were collected as part of a clustered randomised controlled trial. A total of 663 (347 male, 315 female) 8–9-year-old children (M = 8.74, SD = .50) of low SES took part. A 5- and modified 7-factor CFA models were specified using the maximum likelihood estimation. A nested Chi-square difference test was conducted to compare the fit of the models. Internal consistency and floor and ceiling effects were also examined.
Results
CFA found that the hypothesised 5-factor model was an unacceptable fit. However, the modified 7-factor model was supported. A nested Chi-square difference test confirmed that the fit of the 7-factor model was significantly better than that of the 5-factor model. Internal consistency was unacceptable for just one scale. Ceiling effects were present in all but one of the factors.
Conclusions
Future research should apply the 7-factor model with children of low socio-economic status. Such efforts would help monitor the health status of the population.
Background
Kidscreen-27 was developed as part of a cross-cultural European Union-funded project to standardise the measurement of children’s health-related quality of life. Yet, research has reported mixed evidence for the hypothesised 5-factor model, and no confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) has been conducted on the instrument with children of low socio-economic status (SES) across Ireland (Northern and Republic).
Method
The data for this study were collected as part of a clustered randomised controlled trial. A total of 663 (347 male, 315 female) 8–9-year-old children (M = 8.74, SD = .50) of low SES took part. A 5- and modified 7-factor CFA models were specified using the maximum likelihood estimation. A nested Chi-square difference test was conducted to compare the fit of the models. Internal consistency and floor and ceiling effects were also examined.
Results
CFA found that the hypothesised 5-factor model was an unacceptable fit. However, the modified 7-factor model was supported. A nested Chi-square difference test confirmed that the fit of the 7-factor model was significantly better than that of the 5-factor model. Internal consistency was unacceptable for just one scale. Ceiling effects were present in all but one of the factors.
Conclusions
Future research should apply the 7-factor model with children of low socio-economic status. Such efforts would help monitor the health status of the population.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1081–1089 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Quality of Life Research |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 18 Oct 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 30 Apr 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Children
- Confirmatory factor analysis
- socio-economic status
- emotion
- mental health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Testing the psychometric properties of Kidscreen-27 with Irish children of low socio-economic status'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Student theses
-
Physical activity and well-being in children of low socio-economic status: testing self-determination theory
Shannon, S. (Author), Breslin, G. (Supervisor) & Brennan, D. (Supervisor), 2017Student thesis: Doctoral Thesis
File
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver