Telling it like it is survivors' perceptions of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Brandon Hamber, Dineo Nageng, Gabriel O'Malley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The article focuses on survivors' perspectives of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). It probes their feelings, thoughts and views both before and after interacting with the Commission. Their feelings and opinions about issues such as justice, punishment and amnesty are explored. This information, which forms the backbone of this article, was obtained from interviews with twenty survivors of political violence committed under the apartheid government. The article shows that healing, truth, justice and reconciliation are interrelated. For survivors the relationships between the concepts is not linear, that is truth does not automatically lead to reconciliation. The article demonstrates that those who interacted with the TRC held a range of largely legitimate expectations; most expected, at the very least, that they would get some truth about their case. Many are currently feeling let down by the TRC process, despite its successes at publicising the atrocities of the past and fostering national reconciliation.
LanguageEnglish
Pages18-42
JournalPsychology in Society
Volume26
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

reconciliation
justice
amnesty
political violence
apartheid
penalty
interview

Keywords

  • TRC
  • South Africa
  • reconciliation
  • victims
  • truth commission

Cite this

Hamber, Brandon ; Nageng, Dineo ; O'Malley, Gabriel. / Telling it like it is survivors' perceptions of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. 2000 ; Vol. 26. pp. 18-42.
@article{56b9b8c0fd474dc0b5e8226af896a606,
title = "Telling it like it is survivors' perceptions of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission",
abstract = "The article focuses on survivors' perspectives of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). It probes their feelings, thoughts and views both before and after interacting with the Commission. Their feelings and opinions about issues such as justice, punishment and amnesty are explored. This information, which forms the backbone of this article, was obtained from interviews with twenty survivors of political violence committed under the apartheid government. The article shows that healing, truth, justice and reconciliation are interrelated. For survivors the relationships between the concepts is not linear, that is truth does not automatically lead to reconciliation. The article demonstrates that those who interacted with the TRC held a range of largely legitimate expectations; most expected, at the very least, that they would get some truth about their case. Many are currently feeling let down by the TRC process, despite its successes at publicising the atrocities of the past and fostering national reconciliation.",
keywords = "TRC, South Africa, reconciliation, victims, truth commission",
author = "Brandon Hamber and Dineo Nageng and Gabriel O'Malley",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "18--42",

}

Telling it like it is survivors' perceptions of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. / Hamber, Brandon; Nageng, Dineo; O'Malley, Gabriel.

Vol. 26, 2000, p. 18-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Telling it like it is survivors' perceptions of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission

AU - Hamber, Brandon

AU - Nageng, Dineo

AU - O'Malley, Gabriel

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - The article focuses on survivors' perspectives of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). It probes their feelings, thoughts and views both before and after interacting with the Commission. Their feelings and opinions about issues such as justice, punishment and amnesty are explored. This information, which forms the backbone of this article, was obtained from interviews with twenty survivors of political violence committed under the apartheid government. The article shows that healing, truth, justice and reconciliation are interrelated. For survivors the relationships between the concepts is not linear, that is truth does not automatically lead to reconciliation. The article demonstrates that those who interacted with the TRC held a range of largely legitimate expectations; most expected, at the very least, that they would get some truth about their case. Many are currently feeling let down by the TRC process, despite its successes at publicising the atrocities of the past and fostering national reconciliation.

AB - The article focuses on survivors' perspectives of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). It probes their feelings, thoughts and views both before and after interacting with the Commission. Their feelings and opinions about issues such as justice, punishment and amnesty are explored. This information, which forms the backbone of this article, was obtained from interviews with twenty survivors of political violence committed under the apartheid government. The article shows that healing, truth, justice and reconciliation are interrelated. For survivors the relationships between the concepts is not linear, that is truth does not automatically lead to reconciliation. The article demonstrates that those who interacted with the TRC held a range of largely legitimate expectations; most expected, at the very least, that they would get some truth about their case. Many are currently feeling let down by the TRC process, despite its successes at publicising the atrocities of the past and fostering national reconciliation.

KW - TRC

KW - South Africa

KW - reconciliation

KW - victims

KW - truth commission

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 18

EP - 42

ER -