Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Technoeconomic and Life-Cycle Assessment of Multi-Product and Single-Product Lignocellulosic Biorefineries

  • Seyedamirreza Babaei
  • , Lauren Philips
  • , Juhee Lee
  • , Eun Joong Oh
  • , Y Huang
  • , Adriana C Neves
  • , Yinglei Han
  • , Jikai Zhao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study compares technoeconomic analysis (TEA) and life-cycle assessment (LCA) for single-product and multi-product biorefineries producing ethanol, butanol, itaconic acid (IA), and 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) from brewer’s spent grain. Single-product biorefineries had minimum selling prices (MSPs) of $1.26 kg-1 for ethanol, $2.41 kg-1 for butanol, $2.74 kg-1 for IA, and $5.46 kg-1 for 3-HP. In the 8,000 MT/day multi-product biorefinery, butanol had a lower MSP ($2.32 kg-1), while ethanol had a higher MSP ($1.74 kg-1). The MSP for 3-HP also increased to $7.07 kg-1. A feedstock-constrained 2,000 MT/day multi-product scenario further increased MSPs, indicating the importance of economies of scale. Sensitivity and Monte Carlo analyses indicate that MSP is mainly governed by product conversion efficiency and plant production capacity. Global warming potentials (GWPs) ranged from 5.50 kg CO2-eq kg-1 for butanol to 9.07 kg CO2-eq kg-1 for 3-HP. Enzyme production dominated life-cycle GWP, with biogenic carbon uptake providing partial offset. These findings indicate that multi-product biorefineries do not consistently enhance economic or environmental performance, as the outcomes depend on the product properties, production scale, and separation requirements.
Original languageEnglish
Article number135443
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalBioresource Technology
Volume461
Issue number135443
Early online date19 Jul 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished online - 19 Jul 2026

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2026 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Rights Retention Statement

This Author Accepted Manuscript has been made open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0) under the terms of Ulster University Rights Retention Policy for Scholarly Works.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Funding

This work is supported by the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative - Foundational and Applied Science Program, project award no. 2024-68016-43831, from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  3. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  4. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  5. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • Minimum selling price
  • Brewer’s spent grain
  • Process integration
  • Biomanufacturing
  • Bioproducts
  • Minimumsellingprice
  • Brewer’sspentgrain
  • Processintegration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Technoeconomic and Life-Cycle Assessment of Multi-Product and Single-Product Lignocellulosic Biorefineries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this