Talk-time differences between interregional and intraregional calls to a crisis helpline: Statistical analysis

Robin Turkington, Courtney Potts, Maurice Mulvenna, RR Bond, Siobhan O'Neill, Edel Ennis, Katie Hardcastle, Elizabeth Scowcroft, Ciaran Moore, Louise Hamra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background:National suicide prevention strategies are general population-based approaches to prevent suicide by promoting help-seeking behaviors and implementing interventions. Crisis helplines are one of the suicide prevention resources available for public use, where individuals experiencing a crisis can talk to a trained volunteer. Samaritans UK operates on a national scale, with a number of branches located within each of the United Kingdom’s 4 countries or regions.

Objectives:The aim of this study was to identify any differences in call duration across the helpline service in order to determine whether service varied interregionally and intraregionally and to determine the impact of calls answered in the same region as the caller, compared with calls answered in a different region on the duration of calls made from landlines to Samaritans UK.

Methods:Calls may be routed by Samaritans, wherein the telephony system sends the call to the next available volunteer, irrespective of location; therefore, individuals may be routed to a branch within the same region as the caller’s current region (intraregional calls) or routed to a branch that is in a different region from that of the caller’s current region (interregional calls). The origin of calls by region was identified using the landline prefix of the anonymized caller identifier, along with the region of the destination branch (as branch details are recorded in the call details record). First, a Levene’s test of homogeneity of variance was carried out for each condition, that is, England calls and Scotland calls. Thereafter, for each condition, a one-way ANOVA or one-way analysis of means was carried out to evaluate any significant differences in call duration.

Results:ANOVA results showed that there are significant differences in call durations between intraregional calls and interregional calls (P<.001). Across all conditions within this study, callers stayed on the phone for a shorter period of time when routed to a branch that is within the same region as the call origin than if they were put through to a branch within a different region than the call origin.

Conclusions:Statistical analyses showed that there were significant differences between interregional and intraregional calls. On average, callers to crisis helplines stayed on the phone for a shorter period of time if they were routed to a branch within the same region in which the call originated than if they were routed to a branch in a different region of origin. The findings from this study have practical applications, which may allow crisis helplines to manage their resources more effectively and improve caller satisfaction with the service.

Original languageEnglish
Article number58162
Pages (from-to)1-25
Number of pages25
JournalJMIR Mental Health
Volume11
Issue number58162
Early online date19 Sept 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished online - 19 Sept 2024

Bibliographical note

© Robin Turkington, Courtney Potts, Maurice Mulvenna, Raymond Bond, Siobhán O'Neill, Edel Ennis, Katie Hardcastle, Elizabeth Scowcroft, Ciaran Moore, Louise Hamra. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (https://mental.jmir.org).

Keywords

  • Crisis helplines
  • Call duration
  • Mental health
  • regional differences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Talk-time differences between interregional and intraregional calls to a crisis helpline: Statistical analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this