Abstract
It is ironic that the potential expansionary effects of fiscal contractions have
become known as non-Keynesian effects. This paper highlights the fact that Keynes and his contemporaries were aware of such potential perverse effects. It is clear that the important indirect effects of budgetary policy via expectation were known in the 1930s. Moreover, the economists of the time recognised the possibilities before they occurred. This paper supplements the existing research on the Expansionary Fiscal Contraction hypothesis by comparing the political and economic environments of two periods in economic history, Britain in 1930-1931 and Ireland 1986-1987, and the accompanying economic thought.
become known as non-Keynesian effects. This paper highlights the fact that Keynes and his contemporaries were aware of such potential perverse effects. It is clear that the important indirect effects of budgetary policy via expectation were known in the 1930s. Moreover, the economists of the time recognised the possibilities before they occurred. This paper supplements the existing research on the Expansionary Fiscal Contraction hypothesis by comparing the political and economic environments of two periods in economic history, Britain in 1930-1931 and Ireland 1986-1987, and the accompanying economic thought.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 147-167 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice |
Volume | 2010 |
Issue number | 2/3 |
Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 2010 |