@article{dd39d34d8f6c4fbdbf30eadf5d2cb5c7,
title = "Tackling Poverty Across the United Kingdom. Devolution, Difference and Discourse",
abstract = "The UK welfare state is often considered as being highly centralised, yet the design and administration of UK social security involves significant spatial variations in law, policy, and practice. As such, where you live in the UK can affect the value of benefits and cash transfers you are entitled to, as well as how you experience benefit administration. In this article we advocate for greater consideration of spatial variations in social security and draw attention to existing policy differences in the devolved nations and across localities. The article explores policy discourse and design differences to identify competing narratives and to encourage greater consideration of spatial policy developments in social security. Drawing attention to the Safety Nets research project, it argues that a better understanding of the causes and outcomes of spatial variation in social security provision is necessary in the context of governance reforms to increase devolution and decentralistion including the rise of mayoral regions in England. ",
keywords = "social security, poverty, welfare state, benefits, devolution, social citizenship",
author = "Ruth Patrick and Hayley Bennett and John Hudson and Mark Simpson",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 The Author(s). IPPR Progressive Review published by John Wiley \& Sons Ltd on behalf of Institute of Public Policy Research. This paper is drawn from the {\textquoteleft}Safety Nets: Social Security for Families in a Devolved UK{\textquoteright} project. This project has been funded by the Nuffield Foundation, but the views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Foundation.",
year = "2025",
month = apr,
day = "11",
doi = "10.1111/newe.70000",
language = "English",
pages = "1--5",
journal = "IPPR Progressive Review",
issn = "2573-2323",
}