Systematic random sampling of the comet assay

Darragh G McArt, Gillian R Wasson, George McKerr, Kurt Saetzler, Matt Reed, Vyvyan Howard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The comet assay is a technique used to quantify DNA damage and repair at a cellular level. In the assay, cells are embedded in agarose and the cellular content is stripped away leaving only the DNA trapped in an agarose cavity which can then be electrophoresed. The damaged DNA can enter the agarose and migrate while the undamaged DNA cannot and is retained. DNA damage is measured as the proportion of the migratory tail' DNA compared to the total DNA in the cell. The fundamental basis of these arbitrary values is obtained in the comet acquisition phase using fluorescence microscopy with a stoichiometric stain in tandem with image analysis software. Current methods deployed in such an acquisition are expected to be both objectively and randomly obtained. In this paper we examine the randomness' of the acquisition phase and suggest an alternative method that offers both objective and unbiased comet selection. In order to achieve this, we have adopted a survey sampling approach widely used in stereology, which offers a method of systematic random sampling (SRS). This is desirable as it offers an impartial and reproducible method of comet analysis that can be used both manually or automated. By making use of an unbiased sampling frame and using microscope verniers, we are able to increase the precision of estimates of DNA damage. Results obtained from a multiple-user pooled variation experiment showed that the SRS technique attained a lower variability than that of the traditional approach. The analysis of a single user with repetition experiment showed greater individual variances while not being detrimental to overall averages. This would suggest that the SRS method offers a better reflection of DNA damage for a given slide and also offers better user reproducibility.
LanguageEnglish
Pages373-378
JournalMutagenesis
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Assays
DNA
Sampling
Fluorescence microscopy
Image analysis
Microscopes
Repair
Experiments

Cite this

McArt, D. G., Wasson, G. R., McKerr, G., Saetzler, K., Reed, M., & Howard, V. (2009). Systematic random sampling of the comet assay. Mutagenesis, 24(4), 373-378. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gep020
McArt, Darragh G ; Wasson, Gillian R ; McKerr, George ; Saetzler, Kurt ; Reed, Matt ; Howard, Vyvyan. / Systematic random sampling of the comet assay. In: Mutagenesis. 2009 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 373-378.
@article{8ae34d2c92914280bf6000558b35cc2a,
title = "Systematic random sampling of the comet assay",
abstract = "The comet assay is a technique used to quantify DNA damage and repair at a cellular level. In the assay, cells are embedded in agarose and the cellular content is stripped away leaving only the DNA trapped in an agarose cavity which can then be electrophoresed. The damaged DNA can enter the agarose and migrate while the undamaged DNA cannot and is retained. DNA damage is measured as the proportion of the migratory tail' DNA compared to the total DNA in the cell. The fundamental basis of these arbitrary values is obtained in the comet acquisition phase using fluorescence microscopy with a stoichiometric stain in tandem with image analysis software. Current methods deployed in such an acquisition are expected to be both objectively and randomly obtained. In this paper we examine the randomness' of the acquisition phase and suggest an alternative method that offers both objective and unbiased comet selection. In order to achieve this, we have adopted a survey sampling approach widely used in stereology, which offers a method of systematic random sampling (SRS). This is desirable as it offers an impartial and reproducible method of comet analysis that can be used both manually or automated. By making use of an unbiased sampling frame and using microscope verniers, we are able to increase the precision of estimates of DNA damage. Results obtained from a multiple-user pooled variation experiment showed that the SRS technique attained a lower variability than that of the traditional approach. The analysis of a single user with repetition experiment showed greater individual variances while not being detrimental to overall averages. This would suggest that the SRS method offers a better reflection of DNA damage for a given slide and also offers better user reproducibility.",
author = "McArt, {Darragh G} and Wasson, {Gillian R} and George McKerr and Kurt Saetzler and Matt Reed and Vyvyan Howard",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1093/mutage/gep020",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "373--378",
journal = "Mutagenesis",
issn = "0267-8357",
number = "4",

}

McArt, DG, Wasson, GR, McKerr, G, Saetzler, K, Reed, M & Howard, V 2009, 'Systematic random sampling of the comet assay', Mutagenesis, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 373-378. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gep020

Systematic random sampling of the comet assay. / McArt, Darragh G; Wasson, Gillian R; McKerr, George; Saetzler, Kurt; Reed, Matt; Howard, Vyvyan.

In: Mutagenesis, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2009, p. 373-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic random sampling of the comet assay

AU - McArt, Darragh G

AU - Wasson, Gillian R

AU - McKerr, George

AU - Saetzler, Kurt

AU - Reed, Matt

AU - Howard, Vyvyan

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - The comet assay is a technique used to quantify DNA damage and repair at a cellular level. In the assay, cells are embedded in agarose and the cellular content is stripped away leaving only the DNA trapped in an agarose cavity which can then be electrophoresed. The damaged DNA can enter the agarose and migrate while the undamaged DNA cannot and is retained. DNA damage is measured as the proportion of the migratory tail' DNA compared to the total DNA in the cell. The fundamental basis of these arbitrary values is obtained in the comet acquisition phase using fluorescence microscopy with a stoichiometric stain in tandem with image analysis software. Current methods deployed in such an acquisition are expected to be both objectively and randomly obtained. In this paper we examine the randomness' of the acquisition phase and suggest an alternative method that offers both objective and unbiased comet selection. In order to achieve this, we have adopted a survey sampling approach widely used in stereology, which offers a method of systematic random sampling (SRS). This is desirable as it offers an impartial and reproducible method of comet analysis that can be used both manually or automated. By making use of an unbiased sampling frame and using microscope verniers, we are able to increase the precision of estimates of DNA damage. Results obtained from a multiple-user pooled variation experiment showed that the SRS technique attained a lower variability than that of the traditional approach. The analysis of a single user with repetition experiment showed greater individual variances while not being detrimental to overall averages. This would suggest that the SRS method offers a better reflection of DNA damage for a given slide and also offers better user reproducibility.

AB - The comet assay is a technique used to quantify DNA damage and repair at a cellular level. In the assay, cells are embedded in agarose and the cellular content is stripped away leaving only the DNA trapped in an agarose cavity which can then be electrophoresed. The damaged DNA can enter the agarose and migrate while the undamaged DNA cannot and is retained. DNA damage is measured as the proportion of the migratory tail' DNA compared to the total DNA in the cell. The fundamental basis of these arbitrary values is obtained in the comet acquisition phase using fluorescence microscopy with a stoichiometric stain in tandem with image analysis software. Current methods deployed in such an acquisition are expected to be both objectively and randomly obtained. In this paper we examine the randomness' of the acquisition phase and suggest an alternative method that offers both objective and unbiased comet selection. In order to achieve this, we have adopted a survey sampling approach widely used in stereology, which offers a method of systematic random sampling (SRS). This is desirable as it offers an impartial and reproducible method of comet analysis that can be used both manually or automated. By making use of an unbiased sampling frame and using microscope verniers, we are able to increase the precision of estimates of DNA damage. Results obtained from a multiple-user pooled variation experiment showed that the SRS technique attained a lower variability than that of the traditional approach. The analysis of a single user with repetition experiment showed greater individual variances while not being detrimental to overall averages. This would suggest that the SRS method offers a better reflection of DNA damage for a given slide and also offers better user reproducibility.

U2 - 10.1093/mutage/gep020

DO - 10.1093/mutage/gep020

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 373

EP - 378

JO - Mutagenesis

T2 - Mutagenesis

JF - Mutagenesis

SN - 0267-8357

IS - 4

ER -

McArt DG, Wasson GR, McKerr G, Saetzler K, Reed M, Howard V. Systematic random sampling of the comet assay. Mutagenesis. 2009;24(4):373-378. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gep020