Systematic literature review of determinants of sedentary behaviour in older adults: a DEDIPAC study

SFM Chastin, C Buck, E Freiberger, MH Murphy, J Brug, G Cardon, G O"Donoghue, G Pigeot, JM Oppert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Older adults are the most sedentary segment of society and high sedentary time is associated withpoor health and wellbeing outcomes in this population. Identifying determinants of sedentary behaviour is anecessary step to develop interventions to reduce sedentary time.Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify factors associated with sedentary behaviourin older adults. Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched for articles publishedbetween 2000 and May 2014. The search strategy was based on four key elements: (a) sedentary behaviour andits synonyms; (b) determinants and its synonyms (e.g. correlates, factors); (c) types of sedentary behaviour (e.g. TVviewing, sitting, gaming) and (d) types of determinants (e.g. environmental, behavioural). Articles were included inthe review if specific information about sedentary behaviour in older adults was reported. Studies on samplesidentified by disease were excluded. Study quality was rated by means of QUALSYST. The full review protocol isavailable from PROSPERO (PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014009823). The analysis was guided by the socio-ecologicalmodel framework.Results: Twenty-two original studies were identified out of 4472 returned by the systematic search. These included19 cross-sectional, 2 longitudinal and 1 qualitative studies, all published after 2011. Half of the studies wereEuropean. The study quality was generally high with a median of 82 % (IQR 69–96 %) using Qualsyst tool. Personalfactors were the most frequently investigated with consistent positive association for age, negative for retirement,obesity and health status. Only four studies considered environmental determinants suggesting possible associationwith mode of transport, type of housing, cultural opportunities and neighbourhood safety and availability of placesto rest. Only two studies investigated mediating factors. Very limited information was available on contexts andsub-domains of sedentary behaviours.Conclusion: Few studies have investigated determinants of sedentary behaviour in older adults and these have todate mostly focussed on personal factors, and qualitative studies were mostly lacking. More longitudinal studies areneeded as well as inclusion of a broader range of personal and contextual potential determinants towards asystems-based approach, and future studies should be more informed by qualitative work.
LanguageEnglish
Pages127
JournalInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2015

Fingerprint

Retirement
PubMed
Health Status
Longitudinal Studies
Obesity
Safety
Health
Population

Keywords

  • Sitting
  • Sedentary behaviour
  • Determinants
  • Older adults
  • Ageing
  • Life-course
  • Obesity
  • System-based
  • approach
  • Physical activity
  • Environment

Cite this

Chastin, SFM ; Buck, C ; Freiberger, E ; Murphy, MH ; Brug, J ; Cardon, G ; O"Donoghue, G ; Pigeot, G ; Oppert, JM. / Systematic literature review of determinants of sedentary behaviour in older adults: a DEDIPAC study. In: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2015 ; Vol. 12. pp. 127.
@article{cec72055865f41239e5e9dd1c14b833d,
title = "Systematic literature review of determinants of sedentary behaviour in older adults: a DEDIPAC study",
abstract = "Background: Older adults are the most sedentary segment of society and high sedentary time is associated withpoor health and wellbeing outcomes in this population. Identifying determinants of sedentary behaviour is anecessary step to develop interventions to reduce sedentary time.Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify factors associated with sedentary behaviourin older adults. Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched for articles publishedbetween 2000 and May 2014. The search strategy was based on four key elements: (a) sedentary behaviour andits synonyms; (b) determinants and its synonyms (e.g. correlates, factors); (c) types of sedentary behaviour (e.g. TVviewing, sitting, gaming) and (d) types of determinants (e.g. environmental, behavioural). Articles were included inthe review if specific information about sedentary behaviour in older adults was reported. Studies on samplesidentified by disease were excluded. Study quality was rated by means of QUALSYST. The full review protocol isavailable from PROSPERO (PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014009823). The analysis was guided by the socio-ecologicalmodel framework.Results: Twenty-two original studies were identified out of 4472 returned by the systematic search. These included19 cross-sectional, 2 longitudinal and 1 qualitative studies, all published after 2011. Half of the studies wereEuropean. The study quality was generally high with a median of 82 {\%} (IQR 69–96 {\%}) using Qualsyst tool. Personalfactors were the most frequently investigated with consistent positive association for age, negative for retirement,obesity and health status. Only four studies considered environmental determinants suggesting possible associationwith mode of transport, type of housing, cultural opportunities and neighbourhood safety and availability of placesto rest. Only two studies investigated mediating factors. Very limited information was available on contexts andsub-domains of sedentary behaviours.Conclusion: Few studies have investigated determinants of sedentary behaviour in older adults and these have todate mostly focussed on personal factors, and qualitative studies were mostly lacking. More longitudinal studies areneeded as well as inclusion of a broader range of personal and contextual potential determinants towards asystems-based approach, and future studies should be more informed by qualitative work.",
keywords = "Sitting, Sedentary behaviour, Determinants, Older adults, Ageing, Life-course, Obesity, System-based, approach, Physical activity, Environment",
author = "SFM Chastin and C Buck and E Freiberger and MH Murphy and J Brug and G Cardon and G O{"}Donoghue and G Pigeot and JM Oppert",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1186/s12966-015-0292-3",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "127",
journal = "International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity",
issn = "1479-5868",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

Systematic literature review of determinants of sedentary behaviour in older adults: a DEDIPAC study. / Chastin, SFM; Buck, C; Freiberger, E; Murphy, MH; Brug, J; Cardon, G; O"Donoghue, G; Pigeot, G; Oppert, JM.

In: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, Vol. 12, 10.2015, p. 127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic literature review of determinants of sedentary behaviour in older adults: a DEDIPAC study

AU - Chastin, SFM

AU - Buck, C

AU - Freiberger, E

AU - Murphy, MH

AU - Brug, J

AU - Cardon, G

AU - O"Donoghue, G

AU - Pigeot, G

AU - Oppert, JM

PY - 2015/10

Y1 - 2015/10

N2 - Background: Older adults are the most sedentary segment of society and high sedentary time is associated withpoor health and wellbeing outcomes in this population. Identifying determinants of sedentary behaviour is anecessary step to develop interventions to reduce sedentary time.Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify factors associated with sedentary behaviourin older adults. Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched for articles publishedbetween 2000 and May 2014. The search strategy was based on four key elements: (a) sedentary behaviour andits synonyms; (b) determinants and its synonyms (e.g. correlates, factors); (c) types of sedentary behaviour (e.g. TVviewing, sitting, gaming) and (d) types of determinants (e.g. environmental, behavioural). Articles were included inthe review if specific information about sedentary behaviour in older adults was reported. Studies on samplesidentified by disease were excluded. Study quality was rated by means of QUALSYST. The full review protocol isavailable from PROSPERO (PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014009823). The analysis was guided by the socio-ecologicalmodel framework.Results: Twenty-two original studies were identified out of 4472 returned by the systematic search. These included19 cross-sectional, 2 longitudinal and 1 qualitative studies, all published after 2011. Half of the studies wereEuropean. The study quality was generally high with a median of 82 % (IQR 69–96 %) using Qualsyst tool. Personalfactors were the most frequently investigated with consistent positive association for age, negative for retirement,obesity and health status. Only four studies considered environmental determinants suggesting possible associationwith mode of transport, type of housing, cultural opportunities and neighbourhood safety and availability of placesto rest. Only two studies investigated mediating factors. Very limited information was available on contexts andsub-domains of sedentary behaviours.Conclusion: Few studies have investigated determinants of sedentary behaviour in older adults and these have todate mostly focussed on personal factors, and qualitative studies were mostly lacking. More longitudinal studies areneeded as well as inclusion of a broader range of personal and contextual potential determinants towards asystems-based approach, and future studies should be more informed by qualitative work.

AB - Background: Older adults are the most sedentary segment of society and high sedentary time is associated withpoor health and wellbeing outcomes in this population. Identifying determinants of sedentary behaviour is anecessary step to develop interventions to reduce sedentary time.Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify factors associated with sedentary behaviourin older adults. Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched for articles publishedbetween 2000 and May 2014. The search strategy was based on four key elements: (a) sedentary behaviour andits synonyms; (b) determinants and its synonyms (e.g. correlates, factors); (c) types of sedentary behaviour (e.g. TVviewing, sitting, gaming) and (d) types of determinants (e.g. environmental, behavioural). Articles were included inthe review if specific information about sedentary behaviour in older adults was reported. Studies on samplesidentified by disease were excluded. Study quality was rated by means of QUALSYST. The full review protocol isavailable from PROSPERO (PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014009823). The analysis was guided by the socio-ecologicalmodel framework.Results: Twenty-two original studies were identified out of 4472 returned by the systematic search. These included19 cross-sectional, 2 longitudinal and 1 qualitative studies, all published after 2011. Half of the studies wereEuropean. The study quality was generally high with a median of 82 % (IQR 69–96 %) using Qualsyst tool. Personalfactors were the most frequently investigated with consistent positive association for age, negative for retirement,obesity and health status. Only four studies considered environmental determinants suggesting possible associationwith mode of transport, type of housing, cultural opportunities and neighbourhood safety and availability of placesto rest. Only two studies investigated mediating factors. Very limited information was available on contexts andsub-domains of sedentary behaviours.Conclusion: Few studies have investigated determinants of sedentary behaviour in older adults and these have todate mostly focussed on personal factors, and qualitative studies were mostly lacking. More longitudinal studies areneeded as well as inclusion of a broader range of personal and contextual potential determinants towards asystems-based approach, and future studies should be more informed by qualitative work.

KW - Sitting

KW - Sedentary behaviour

KW - Determinants

KW - Older adults

KW - Ageing

KW - Life-course

KW - Obesity

KW - System-based

KW - approach

KW - Physical activity

KW - Environment

U2 - 10.1186/s12966-015-0292-3

DO - 10.1186/s12966-015-0292-3

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 127

JO - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

T2 - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

JF - International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

SN - 1479-5868

ER -