Synchronic variation in the Old English perfect

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Old English, the present/past dichotomy of the Germanic verbal system was supplemented by the development of periphrastic forms such as the perfect and pluperfect. However, the inflected past tense continued to be used beside these newer forms to express similar temporal content. The research presented here aims to provide accurate quantitative data on the distribution within Old English texts both of the periphrastic forms and of semantically comparable preterites. Upon analysis, these data reveal a substantial degree of synchronic variation among Old English texts in their use of these grammatical categories, with no observable diachronic trends. The evidence does not suggest that this variation is grammatically motivated; it is hypothesised that the preterite and the periphrastic forms differed in their perceived stylistic value, although the exact details of such a difference may no longer be recoverable.
LanguageEnglish
Pages319-343
Number of pages24
JournalTransactions of the Philological Society
Volume112
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jun 2013

Fingerprint

data analysis
present
trend
evidence
Values

Cite this

Macleod, Morgan. / Synchronic variation in the Old English perfect. 2013 ; Vol. 112, No. 3. pp. 319-343.
@article{ca7d828e18914e129e5b837e4f90ec8c,
title = "Synchronic variation in the Old English perfect",
abstract = "In Old English, the present/past dichotomy of the Germanic verbal system was supplemented by the development of periphrastic forms such as the perfect and pluperfect. However, the inflected past tense continued to be used beside these newer forms to express similar temporal content. The research presented here aims to provide accurate quantitative data on the distribution within Old English texts both of the periphrastic forms and of semantically comparable preterites. Upon analysis, these data reveal a substantial degree of synchronic variation among Old English texts in their use of these grammatical categories, with no observable diachronic trends. The evidence does not suggest that this variation is grammatically motivated; it is hypothesised that the preterite and the periphrastic forms differed in their perceived stylistic value, although the exact details of such a difference may no longer be recoverable.",
author = "Morgan Macleod",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1111/1467-968X.12029",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "319--343",
number = "3",

}

Synchronic variation in the Old English perfect. / Macleod, Morgan.

Vol. 112, No. 3, 22.06.2013, p. 319-343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Synchronic variation in the Old English perfect

AU - Macleod, Morgan

PY - 2013/6/22

Y1 - 2013/6/22

N2 - In Old English, the present/past dichotomy of the Germanic verbal system was supplemented by the development of periphrastic forms such as the perfect and pluperfect. However, the inflected past tense continued to be used beside these newer forms to express similar temporal content. The research presented here aims to provide accurate quantitative data on the distribution within Old English texts both of the periphrastic forms and of semantically comparable preterites. Upon analysis, these data reveal a substantial degree of synchronic variation among Old English texts in their use of these grammatical categories, with no observable diachronic trends. The evidence does not suggest that this variation is grammatically motivated; it is hypothesised that the preterite and the periphrastic forms differed in their perceived stylistic value, although the exact details of such a difference may no longer be recoverable.

AB - In Old English, the present/past dichotomy of the Germanic verbal system was supplemented by the development of periphrastic forms such as the perfect and pluperfect. However, the inflected past tense continued to be used beside these newer forms to express similar temporal content. The research presented here aims to provide accurate quantitative data on the distribution within Old English texts both of the periphrastic forms and of semantically comparable preterites. Upon analysis, these data reveal a substantial degree of synchronic variation among Old English texts in their use of these grammatical categories, with no observable diachronic trends. The evidence does not suggest that this variation is grammatically motivated; it is hypothesised that the preterite and the periphrastic forms differed in their perceived stylistic value, although the exact details of such a difference may no longer be recoverable.

U2 - 10.1111/1467-968X.12029

DO - 10.1111/1467-968X.12029

M3 - Article

VL - 112

SP - 319

EP - 343

IS - 3

ER -