Symbolic Closure through memory, reparation and revenge in post-conflict societies

Brandon Hamber, Richard Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Countries going through democratic transition have to address how they will deal with the human rights crimes committed during the authoritarian era. In the context of amnesty for perpetrators, truth commissions have emerged as a standard institution to document the violent past. Increasingly, claims are made that truth commissions have beneficial psychological consequences; that is, that they facilitate 'catharsis', or 'heal the nation', or allow the nation to 'work through' a violent past. This article draws upon trauma counseling experience and anthropological fieldwork among survivors to challenge these claims in the context of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. It argues that nations are not like individuals in that they do not have collective psyches, that nation-building discourses on reconciliation often subordinate individual needs, and that truth commissions and individual processes of healing work on different time lines. Calls for reconciliation from national leaders may demand too much psychologically from survivors, and retribution may be just as effective as reconciliation at creating symbolic closure.
LanguageEnglish
Pages35-53
JournalJournal of Human Rights
Volume1
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

reparation
retaliation
reconciliation
society
amnesty
psychological consequences
psyche
state formation
trauma
counseling
human rights
offense
leader
discourse
demand
experience

Keywords

  • South Africa
  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission
  • symbolic closure
  • memory

Cite this

@article{54bbcbeb4a3f42a8a33ceb1f51a34a48,
title = "Symbolic Closure through memory, reparation and revenge in post-conflict societies",
abstract = "Countries going through democratic transition have to address how they will deal with the human rights crimes committed during the authoritarian era. In the context of amnesty for perpetrators, truth commissions have emerged as a standard institution to document the violent past. Increasingly, claims are made that truth commissions have beneficial psychological consequences; that is, that they facilitate 'catharsis', or 'heal the nation', or allow the nation to 'work through' a violent past. This article draws upon trauma counseling experience and anthropological fieldwork among survivors to challenge these claims in the context of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. It argues that nations are not like individuals in that they do not have collective psyches, that nation-building discourses on reconciliation often subordinate individual needs, and that truth commissions and individual processes of healing work on different time lines. Calls for reconciliation from national leaders may demand too much psychologically from survivors, and retribution may be just as effective as reconciliation at creating symbolic closure.",
keywords = "South Africa, Truth and Reconciliation Commission, symbolic closure, memory",
author = "Brandon Hamber and Richard Wilson",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "35--53",
journal = "Journal of Human Rights",
issn = "1475-4835",
number = "1",

}

Symbolic Closure through memory, reparation and revenge in post-conflict societies. / Hamber, Brandon; Wilson, Richard.

In: Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2002, p. 35-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Symbolic Closure through memory, reparation and revenge in post-conflict societies

AU - Hamber, Brandon

AU - Wilson, Richard

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Countries going through democratic transition have to address how they will deal with the human rights crimes committed during the authoritarian era. In the context of amnesty for perpetrators, truth commissions have emerged as a standard institution to document the violent past. Increasingly, claims are made that truth commissions have beneficial psychological consequences; that is, that they facilitate 'catharsis', or 'heal the nation', or allow the nation to 'work through' a violent past. This article draws upon trauma counseling experience and anthropological fieldwork among survivors to challenge these claims in the context of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. It argues that nations are not like individuals in that they do not have collective psyches, that nation-building discourses on reconciliation often subordinate individual needs, and that truth commissions and individual processes of healing work on different time lines. Calls for reconciliation from national leaders may demand too much psychologically from survivors, and retribution may be just as effective as reconciliation at creating symbolic closure.

AB - Countries going through democratic transition have to address how they will deal with the human rights crimes committed during the authoritarian era. In the context of amnesty for perpetrators, truth commissions have emerged as a standard institution to document the violent past. Increasingly, claims are made that truth commissions have beneficial psychological consequences; that is, that they facilitate 'catharsis', or 'heal the nation', or allow the nation to 'work through' a violent past. This article draws upon trauma counseling experience and anthropological fieldwork among survivors to challenge these claims in the context of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. It argues that nations are not like individuals in that they do not have collective psyches, that nation-building discourses on reconciliation often subordinate individual needs, and that truth commissions and individual processes of healing work on different time lines. Calls for reconciliation from national leaders may demand too much psychologically from survivors, and retribution may be just as effective as reconciliation at creating symbolic closure.

KW - South Africa

KW - Truth and Reconciliation Commission

KW - symbolic closure

KW - memory

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 35

EP - 53

JO - Journal of Human Rights

T2 - Journal of Human Rights

JF - Journal of Human Rights

SN - 1475-4835

IS - 1

ER -