Swedish Translation, Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Context Assessment Index (CAI)

KN Kajermo, H Böe, E Johansson, E Henriksen, Brendan McCormack, JP Gustavsson, L Wallin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    BackgroundThe strength of and relationship between the fundamental elements context, evidence and facilitation of the PARIHS framework are proposed to be key for successful implementation of evidence into healthcare practice. A better understanding of the presence and strength of contextual factors is assumed to enhance the opportunities of adequately developing an implementation strategy for a specific setting. A tool for assessing context—The Context Assessment Index (CAI)—was developed and published 2009. A Swedish version of the instrument was developed and evaluated among registered nurses. This work forms the focus of this paper.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to translate the CAI into Swedish, adapt the instrument for use in Swedish healthcare practice and assess its psychometric properties.MethodsThe instrument was translated and back-translated to English. The feasibility of items and response scales were evaluated through think aloud interviews with clinically active nurses. Psychometric properties were evaluated in a sample of registered nurses (n = 373) working in a variety of healthcare organisations in the Stockholm area. Item and factor analyses and Cronbach's alpha were computed to evaluate internal structure and internal consistency.ResultSixteen items were modified based on the think aloud interviews and to adapt the instrument for use in acute care. A ceiling effect was observed for many items and the originally identified 37 item five-factor model was not confirmed. Item analyses showed an overlap between factors and indicated a one-dimensional scale.DiscussionThe Swedish version of the CAI has a wider application than the original instrument. This might have contributed to the differences in factor structure. Different opportunities for further development of the scale are discussed.ConclusionsFurther evaluation of the psychometric properties of the CAI is required.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages41-50
    JournalWORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING
    Volume10
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

    Fingerprint

    Psychometrics
    Nurses
    Delivery of Health Care
    Interviews
    Statistical Factor Analysis

    Cite this

    Kajermo, KN., Böe, H., Johansson, E., Henriksen, E., McCormack, B., Gustavsson, JP., & Wallin, L. (2013). Swedish Translation, Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Context Assessment Index (CAI). WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, 10(1), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00252.x
    Kajermo, KN ; Böe, H ; Johansson, E ; Henriksen, E ; McCormack, Brendan ; Gustavsson, JP ; Wallin, L. / Swedish Translation, Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Context Assessment Index (CAI). In: WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING. 2013 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 41-50.
    @article{a28595b062f8412590945056d69be9d8,
    title = "Swedish Translation, Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Context Assessment Index (CAI)",
    abstract = "BackgroundThe strength of and relationship between the fundamental elements context, evidence and facilitation of the PARIHS framework are proposed to be key for successful implementation of evidence into healthcare practice. A better understanding of the presence and strength of contextual factors is assumed to enhance the opportunities of adequately developing an implementation strategy for a specific setting. A tool for assessing context—The Context Assessment Index (CAI)—was developed and published 2009. A Swedish version of the instrument was developed and evaluated among registered nurses. This work forms the focus of this paper.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to translate the CAI into Swedish, adapt the instrument for use in Swedish healthcare practice and assess its psychometric properties.MethodsThe instrument was translated and back-translated to English. The feasibility of items and response scales were evaluated through think aloud interviews with clinically active nurses. Psychometric properties were evaluated in a sample of registered nurses (n = 373) working in a variety of healthcare organisations in the Stockholm area. Item and factor analyses and Cronbach's alpha were computed to evaluate internal structure and internal consistency.ResultSixteen items were modified based on the think aloud interviews and to adapt the instrument for use in acute care. A ceiling effect was observed for many items and the originally identified 37 item five-factor model was not confirmed. Item analyses showed an overlap between factors and indicated a one-dimensional scale.DiscussionThe Swedish version of the CAI has a wider application than the original instrument. This might have contributed to the differences in factor structure. Different opportunities for further development of the scale are discussed.ConclusionsFurther evaluation of the psychometric properties of the CAI is required.",
    author = "KN Kajermo and H B{\"o}e and E Johansson and E Henriksen and Brendan McCormack and JP Gustavsson and L Wallin",
    year = "2013",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00252.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "41--50",
    journal = "Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing",
    issn = "1545-102X",
    number = "1",

    }

    Kajermo, KN, Böe, H, Johansson, E, Henriksen, E, McCormack, B, Gustavsson, JP & Wallin, L 2013, 'Swedish Translation, Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Context Assessment Index (CAI)', WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00252.x

    Swedish Translation, Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Context Assessment Index (CAI). / Kajermo, KN; Böe, H; Johansson, E; Henriksen, E; McCormack, Brendan; Gustavsson, JP; Wallin, L.

    In: WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, Vol. 10, No. 1, 02.2013, p. 41-50.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Swedish Translation, Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Context Assessment Index (CAI)

    AU - Kajermo, KN

    AU - Böe, H

    AU - Johansson, E

    AU - Henriksen, E

    AU - McCormack, Brendan

    AU - Gustavsson, JP

    AU - Wallin, L

    PY - 2013/2

    Y1 - 2013/2

    N2 - BackgroundThe strength of and relationship between the fundamental elements context, evidence and facilitation of the PARIHS framework are proposed to be key for successful implementation of evidence into healthcare practice. A better understanding of the presence and strength of contextual factors is assumed to enhance the opportunities of adequately developing an implementation strategy for a specific setting. A tool for assessing context—The Context Assessment Index (CAI)—was developed and published 2009. A Swedish version of the instrument was developed and evaluated among registered nurses. This work forms the focus of this paper.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to translate the CAI into Swedish, adapt the instrument for use in Swedish healthcare practice and assess its psychometric properties.MethodsThe instrument was translated and back-translated to English. The feasibility of items and response scales were evaluated through think aloud interviews with clinically active nurses. Psychometric properties were evaluated in a sample of registered nurses (n = 373) working in a variety of healthcare organisations in the Stockholm area. Item and factor analyses and Cronbach's alpha were computed to evaluate internal structure and internal consistency.ResultSixteen items were modified based on the think aloud interviews and to adapt the instrument for use in acute care. A ceiling effect was observed for many items and the originally identified 37 item five-factor model was not confirmed. Item analyses showed an overlap between factors and indicated a one-dimensional scale.DiscussionThe Swedish version of the CAI has a wider application than the original instrument. This might have contributed to the differences in factor structure. Different opportunities for further development of the scale are discussed.ConclusionsFurther evaluation of the psychometric properties of the CAI is required.

    AB - BackgroundThe strength of and relationship between the fundamental elements context, evidence and facilitation of the PARIHS framework are proposed to be key for successful implementation of evidence into healthcare practice. A better understanding of the presence and strength of contextual factors is assumed to enhance the opportunities of adequately developing an implementation strategy for a specific setting. A tool for assessing context—The Context Assessment Index (CAI)—was developed and published 2009. A Swedish version of the instrument was developed and evaluated among registered nurses. This work forms the focus of this paper.PurposeThe purpose of this study was to translate the CAI into Swedish, adapt the instrument for use in Swedish healthcare practice and assess its psychometric properties.MethodsThe instrument was translated and back-translated to English. The feasibility of items and response scales were evaluated through think aloud interviews with clinically active nurses. Psychometric properties were evaluated in a sample of registered nurses (n = 373) working in a variety of healthcare organisations in the Stockholm area. Item and factor analyses and Cronbach's alpha were computed to evaluate internal structure and internal consistency.ResultSixteen items were modified based on the think aloud interviews and to adapt the instrument for use in acute care. A ceiling effect was observed for many items and the originally identified 37 item five-factor model was not confirmed. Item analyses showed an overlap between factors and indicated a one-dimensional scale.DiscussionThe Swedish version of the CAI has a wider application than the original instrument. This might have contributed to the differences in factor structure. Different opportunities for further development of the scale are discussed.ConclusionsFurther evaluation of the psychometric properties of the CAI is required.

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00252.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00252.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    SP - 41

    EP - 50

    JO - Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing

    T2 - Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing

    JF - Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing

    SN - 1545-102X

    IS - 1

    ER -