Swedish Translation, Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Context Assessment Index (CAI)

Kerstin Nilsson Kajermo, Heidi Boe, Eva Johansson, Eva Henriksen, Brendan McCormack, J Petter Gustavsson, Lars Walin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Background: The strength of and relationship between the fundamental elements context, evidence and facilitation of the PARIHS framework are proposed to be key for successful implementation of evidence into healthcare practice. A better understanding of the presence and strength of contextual factors is assumed to enhance the opportunities of adequately developing an implementation strategy for a specific setting. A tool for assessing context—The Context Assessment Index (CAI)—was developedand published 2009. A Swedish version of the instrument was developed and evaluated among registered nurses. This work forms the focus of this paper.Purpose: The purpose of this study was to translate the CAI into Swedish, adapt the instrument for use in Swedish healthcare practice and assess its psychometric properties.Methods: The instrument was translated and back-translated to English. The feasibility of items and response scales were evaluated through think aloud interviews with clinically active nurses. Psychometric properties were evaluated in a sample of registered nurses (n = 373) working in a variety of healthcare organisations in the Stockholm area. Item and factor analyses and Cronbach’s alpha were computed to evaluate internal structure and internal consistency.Result: Sixteen items were modified based on the think aloud interviews and to adapt the instrument for use in acute care. A ceiling effect was observed for many items and the originally identified 37 item five-factor model was not confirmed. Item analyses showed an overlap between factors and indicated a one-dimensional scale.Discussion: The Swedish version of the CAI has a wider application than the original instrument. This might have contributed to the differences in factor structure. Different opportunities for further development of the scale are discussed.Conclusions: Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the CAI is required.
    LanguageEnglish
    JournalWORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING
    Volumeepub
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 30 May 2012

    Fingerprint

    Psychometrics
    Nurses
    Delivery of Health Care
    Interviews
    Statistical Factor Analysis

    Cite this

    Nilsson Kajermo, K., Boe, H., Johansson, E., Henriksen, E., McCormack, B., Gustavsson, J. P., & Walin, L. (2012). Swedish Translation, Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Context Assessment Index (CAI). WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, epub. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00252.x.
    Nilsson Kajermo, Kerstin ; Boe, Heidi ; Johansson, Eva ; Henriksen, Eva ; McCormack, Brendan ; Gustavsson, J Petter ; Walin, Lars. / Swedish Translation, Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Context Assessment Index (CAI). In: WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING. 2012 ; Vol. epub.
    @article{dec63601bfbc43b8b90d3dbc38bb6504,
    title = "Swedish Translation, Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Context Assessment Index (CAI)",
    abstract = "Background: The strength of and relationship between the fundamental elements context, evidence and facilitation of the PARIHS framework are proposed to be key for successful implementation of evidence into healthcare practice. A better understanding of the presence and strength of contextual factors is assumed to enhance the opportunities of adequately developing an implementation strategy for a specific setting. A tool for assessing context—The Context Assessment Index (CAI)—was developedand published 2009. A Swedish version of the instrument was developed and evaluated among registered nurses. This work forms the focus of this paper.Purpose: The purpose of this study was to translate the CAI into Swedish, adapt the instrument for use in Swedish healthcare practice and assess its psychometric properties.Methods: The instrument was translated and back-translated to English. The feasibility of items and response scales were evaluated through think aloud interviews with clinically active nurses. Psychometric properties were evaluated in a sample of registered nurses (n = 373) working in a variety of healthcare organisations in the Stockholm area. Item and factor analyses and Cronbach’s alpha were computed to evaluate internal structure and internal consistency.Result: Sixteen items were modified based on the think aloud interviews and to adapt the instrument for use in acute care. A ceiling effect was observed for many items and the originally identified 37 item five-factor model was not confirmed. Item analyses showed an overlap between factors and indicated a one-dimensional scale.Discussion: The Swedish version of the CAI has a wider application than the original instrument. This might have contributed to the differences in factor structure. Different opportunities for further development of the scale are discussed.Conclusions: Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the CAI is required.",
    author = "{Nilsson Kajermo}, Kerstin and Heidi Boe and Eva Johansson and Eva Henriksen and Brendan McCormack and Gustavsson, {J Petter} and Lars Walin",
    year = "2012",
    month = "5",
    day = "30",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00252.x.",
    language = "English",
    volume = "epub",
    journal = "Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing",
    issn = "1545-102X",

    }

    Swedish Translation, Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Context Assessment Index (CAI). / Nilsson Kajermo, Kerstin; Boe, Heidi; Johansson, Eva; Henriksen, Eva; McCormack, Brendan; Gustavsson, J Petter; Walin, Lars.

    In: WORLDVIEWS ON EVIDENCE-BASED NURSING, Vol. epub, 30.05.2012.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Swedish Translation, Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Context Assessment Index (CAI)

    AU - Nilsson Kajermo, Kerstin

    AU - Boe, Heidi

    AU - Johansson, Eva

    AU - Henriksen, Eva

    AU - McCormack, Brendan

    AU - Gustavsson, J Petter

    AU - Walin, Lars

    PY - 2012/5/30

    Y1 - 2012/5/30

    N2 - Background: The strength of and relationship between the fundamental elements context, evidence and facilitation of the PARIHS framework are proposed to be key for successful implementation of evidence into healthcare practice. A better understanding of the presence and strength of contextual factors is assumed to enhance the opportunities of adequately developing an implementation strategy for a specific setting. A tool for assessing context—The Context Assessment Index (CAI)—was developedand published 2009. A Swedish version of the instrument was developed and evaluated among registered nurses. This work forms the focus of this paper.Purpose: The purpose of this study was to translate the CAI into Swedish, adapt the instrument for use in Swedish healthcare practice and assess its psychometric properties.Methods: The instrument was translated and back-translated to English. The feasibility of items and response scales were evaluated through think aloud interviews with clinically active nurses. Psychometric properties were evaluated in a sample of registered nurses (n = 373) working in a variety of healthcare organisations in the Stockholm area. Item and factor analyses and Cronbach’s alpha were computed to evaluate internal structure and internal consistency.Result: Sixteen items were modified based on the think aloud interviews and to adapt the instrument for use in acute care. A ceiling effect was observed for many items and the originally identified 37 item five-factor model was not confirmed. Item analyses showed an overlap between factors and indicated a one-dimensional scale.Discussion: The Swedish version of the CAI has a wider application than the original instrument. This might have contributed to the differences in factor structure. Different opportunities for further development of the scale are discussed.Conclusions: Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the CAI is required.

    AB - Background: The strength of and relationship between the fundamental elements context, evidence and facilitation of the PARIHS framework are proposed to be key for successful implementation of evidence into healthcare practice. A better understanding of the presence and strength of contextual factors is assumed to enhance the opportunities of adequately developing an implementation strategy for a specific setting. A tool for assessing context—The Context Assessment Index (CAI)—was developedand published 2009. A Swedish version of the instrument was developed and evaluated among registered nurses. This work forms the focus of this paper.Purpose: The purpose of this study was to translate the CAI into Swedish, adapt the instrument for use in Swedish healthcare practice and assess its psychometric properties.Methods: The instrument was translated and back-translated to English. The feasibility of items and response scales were evaluated through think aloud interviews with clinically active nurses. Psychometric properties were evaluated in a sample of registered nurses (n = 373) working in a variety of healthcare organisations in the Stockholm area. Item and factor analyses and Cronbach’s alpha were computed to evaluate internal structure and internal consistency.Result: Sixteen items were modified based on the think aloud interviews and to adapt the instrument for use in acute care. A ceiling effect was observed for many items and the originally identified 37 item five-factor model was not confirmed. Item analyses showed an overlap between factors and indicated a one-dimensional scale.Discussion: The Swedish version of the CAI has a wider application than the original instrument. This might have contributed to the differences in factor structure. Different opportunities for further development of the scale are discussed.Conclusions: Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the CAI is required.

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00252.x.

    DO - 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2012.00252.x.

    M3 - Article

    VL - epub

    JO - Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing

    T2 - Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing

    JF - Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing

    SN - 1545-102X

    ER -