Survivor Perspectives on IPV Perpetrator Interventions: A Systematic Narrative Review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)
562 Downloads (Pure)


More effective work with perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) can be built upon a better understanding of how and why they change their behavior. This article presents a systematic narrative review of female IPV survivor perspectives on the changes brought about by IPV perpetrator programs. Fourteen databases and web search engines were searched and 16 articles reporting relevant qualitative findings were identified. Survivors often reported some level of positive change through their partner’s engagement with a program, but the sustainability of this change is unclear and there was also some negative feedback. From the survivors’ perspective, key barriers to perpetrator change include alcohol dependency, mental health challenges, relationship dynamics, and their family of origin. Mechanisms by which perpetrators are held to account, namely, survivor validation and judicial measures, were seen as central to the change process. Survivors perceived changes in perpetrator behavior (the use of conflict interruption techniques and new communication skills) and changes in perpetrators’ belief systems (adopting new perspectives). Changes in belief systems were associated with more complete desistence from violence and would appear more difficult to effect. The review highlights the complexity in this field, which is discussed by the authors with reference to practice, policy, and research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)239-255
Number of pages17
JournalTrauma, Violence, and Abuse
Issue number3
Early online date11 May 2015
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 1 Jul 2016


  • domestic violence
  • batterer
  • intervention/treatment
  • change processes
  • behavior change


Dive into the research topics of 'Survivor Perspectives on IPV Perpetrator Interventions: A Systematic Narrative Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this