Supporting and improving community health services - a prospective evaluation of ECHO technology in community palliative care nursing teams

Claire white, Sonja McIlfatrick, Lynn Dunwoody, Max watson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) uses teleconferencing technology to support and train healthcare providers (HCPs) remotely, and has improved care across the United States. A six month pilot was trialled in a community palliative care nursing setting to determine if ECHO would be effective in the UK in providing education and support to community hospice nurses (CHN). MethodsThe pilot involved weekly two hour sessions of teaching and case based discussions facilitated by hospice staff linking with nine teams of CHN using video conferencing technology. A mixed methods prospective longitudinal cohort study was used to evaluate the pilot. Each CHN provided demographic data, and completed a written knowledge assessment and a self-efficacy tool before and after the pilot. Two focus groups were also performed after the pilot. ResultsTwenty-eight CHNs completed the evaluation. Mean knowledge score improved significantly from 71.3% to 82.7% (p = 0.0005) as did overall self-efficacy scores following the ECHO pilot. Pre ECHO (p = 0.036) and Retro-pretest ECHO (p = 0.0005) self-efficacy were significantly lower than Post ECHO. There was no significant difference between Pretest and Retro-Pretest ECHO self-efficacy (p = 0.063). 96% recorded gains in learning, and 90% felt that ECHO had improved the care they provided for patients. 83% would recommend ECHO to other HCPs. 70% stated the technology used in ECHO had given them access to education that would have been hard to access due to geography. ConclusionThis study supports the use of Project ECHO for CHNs in the UK by demonstrating how a 6 month pilot improved both knowledge and self-efficacy. As a low-cost high-impact model, ECHO provides an affordable solution to addressing growing need.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-7
JournalBMJ Supportive and Palliative Care
Volume20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Hospice and Palliative Care Nursing
Community Health Services
Technology
Self Efficacy
Hospices
Nurses
Health Personnel
Education
Geography
Focus Groups

Keywords

  • Project ECHO
  • teleconferencing
  • palliative
  • evaluation-educational intervention
  • innovative educational interventions.

Cite this

@article{1cc05ad404bc402db49e4e98639b4a29,
title = "Supporting and improving community health services - a prospective evaluation of ECHO technology in community palliative care nursing teams",
abstract = "Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) uses teleconferencing technology to support and train healthcare providers (HCPs) remotely, and has improved care across the United States. A six month pilot was trialled in a community palliative care nursing setting to determine if ECHO would be effective in the UK in providing education and support to community hospice nurses (CHN). MethodsThe pilot involved weekly two hour sessions of teaching and case based discussions facilitated by hospice staff linking with nine teams of CHN using video conferencing technology. A mixed methods prospective longitudinal cohort study was used to evaluate the pilot. Each CHN provided demographic data, and completed a written knowledge assessment and a self-efficacy tool before and after the pilot. Two focus groups were also performed after the pilot. ResultsTwenty-eight CHNs completed the evaluation. Mean knowledge score improved significantly from 71.3{\%} to 82.7{\%} (p = 0.0005) as did overall self-efficacy scores following the ECHO pilot. Pre ECHO (p = 0.036) and Retro-pretest ECHO (p = 0.0005) self-efficacy were significantly lower than Post ECHO. There was no significant difference between Pretest and Retro-Pretest ECHO self-efficacy (p = 0.063). 96{\%} recorded gains in learning, and 90{\%} felt that ECHO had improved the care they provided for patients. 83{\%} would recommend ECHO to other HCPs. 70{\%} stated the technology used in ECHO had given them access to education that would have been hard to access due to geography. ConclusionThis study supports the use of Project ECHO for CHNs in the UK by demonstrating how a 6 month pilot improved both knowledge and self-efficacy. As a low-cost high-impact model, ECHO provides an affordable solution to addressing growing need.",
keywords = "Project ECHO, teleconferencing, palliative, evaluation-educational intervention, innovative educational interventions.",
author = "Claire white and Sonja McIlfatrick and Lynn Dunwoody and Max watson",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000935",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care",
issn = "2045-435X",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supporting and improving community health services - a prospective evaluation of ECHO technology in community palliative care nursing teams

AU - white, Claire

AU - McIlfatrick, Sonja

AU - Dunwoody, Lynn

AU - watson, Max

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) uses teleconferencing technology to support and train healthcare providers (HCPs) remotely, and has improved care across the United States. A six month pilot was trialled in a community palliative care nursing setting to determine if ECHO would be effective in the UK in providing education and support to community hospice nurses (CHN). MethodsThe pilot involved weekly two hour sessions of teaching and case based discussions facilitated by hospice staff linking with nine teams of CHN using video conferencing technology. A mixed methods prospective longitudinal cohort study was used to evaluate the pilot. Each CHN provided demographic data, and completed a written knowledge assessment and a self-efficacy tool before and after the pilot. Two focus groups were also performed after the pilot. ResultsTwenty-eight CHNs completed the evaluation. Mean knowledge score improved significantly from 71.3% to 82.7% (p = 0.0005) as did overall self-efficacy scores following the ECHO pilot. Pre ECHO (p = 0.036) and Retro-pretest ECHO (p = 0.0005) self-efficacy were significantly lower than Post ECHO. There was no significant difference between Pretest and Retro-Pretest ECHO self-efficacy (p = 0.063). 96% recorded gains in learning, and 90% felt that ECHO had improved the care they provided for patients. 83% would recommend ECHO to other HCPs. 70% stated the technology used in ECHO had given them access to education that would have been hard to access due to geography. ConclusionThis study supports the use of Project ECHO for CHNs in the UK by demonstrating how a 6 month pilot improved both knowledge and self-efficacy. As a low-cost high-impact model, ECHO provides an affordable solution to addressing growing need.

AB - Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) uses teleconferencing technology to support and train healthcare providers (HCPs) remotely, and has improved care across the United States. A six month pilot was trialled in a community palliative care nursing setting to determine if ECHO would be effective in the UK in providing education and support to community hospice nurses (CHN). MethodsThe pilot involved weekly two hour sessions of teaching and case based discussions facilitated by hospice staff linking with nine teams of CHN using video conferencing technology. A mixed methods prospective longitudinal cohort study was used to evaluate the pilot. Each CHN provided demographic data, and completed a written knowledge assessment and a self-efficacy tool before and after the pilot. Two focus groups were also performed after the pilot. ResultsTwenty-eight CHNs completed the evaluation. Mean knowledge score improved significantly from 71.3% to 82.7% (p = 0.0005) as did overall self-efficacy scores following the ECHO pilot. Pre ECHO (p = 0.036) and Retro-pretest ECHO (p = 0.0005) self-efficacy were significantly lower than Post ECHO. There was no significant difference between Pretest and Retro-Pretest ECHO self-efficacy (p = 0.063). 96% recorded gains in learning, and 90% felt that ECHO had improved the care they provided for patients. 83% would recommend ECHO to other HCPs. 70% stated the technology used in ECHO had given them access to education that would have been hard to access due to geography. ConclusionThis study supports the use of Project ECHO for CHNs in the UK by demonstrating how a 6 month pilot improved both knowledge and self-efficacy. As a low-cost high-impact model, ECHO provides an affordable solution to addressing growing need.

KW - Project ECHO

KW - teleconferencing

KW - palliative

KW - evaluation-educational intervention

KW - innovative educational interventions.

U2 - 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000935

DO - 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000935

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care

T2 - BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care

JF - BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care

SN - 2045-435X

ER -