Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Study protocol for 'The Project about Loneliness and Social networks (PALS)': A pragmatic, randomised trial comparing a facilitated social network intervention (Genie) with a wait-list control for lonely and socially isolated people

  • R. Band
  • , S. Ewings
  • , T. Cheetham-Blake
  • , J. Ellis
  • , K. Breheny
  • , I. Vassilev
  • , M.C. Portillo
  • , L. Yardley
  • , C. Blickem
  • , R. Kandiyali
  • , D. Culliford
  • , A. Rogers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Introduction Loneliness and social isolation have been identified as significant public health concerns, but improving relationships and increasing social participation may improve health outcomes and quality of life. The aim of the Project About Loneliness and Social networks (PALS) study is to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guided social network intervention within a community setting among individuals experiencing loneliness and isolation and to understand implementation of Generating Engagement in Network Involvement (Genie) in the context of different organisations. Methods and analysis The PALS trial will be a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial comparing participants receiving the Genie intervention to a wait-list control group. Eligible participants will be recruited from organisations working within a community setting: Any adult identified as socially isolated or at-risk of loneliness and living in the community will be eligible. Genie will be delivered by trained facilitators recruited from community organisations. The primary outcome will be the difference in the SF-12 Mental Health composite scale score at 6-month follow-up between the intervention and control group using a mixed effects model (accounting for clustering within facilitators and organisation). Secondary outcomes will be loneliness, social isolation, well-being, physical health and engagement with new activities. The economic evaluation will use a cost-utility approach, and adopt a public sector perspective to include health-related resource use and costs incurred by other public services. Exploratory analysis will use a societal perspective, and explore broader measures of benefit (capability well-being). A qualitative process evaluation will explore organisational and environmental arrangements, as well as stakeholder and participant experiences of the study to understand the factors likely to influence future sustainability, implementation and scalability of using a social network intervention within this context. Ethics and dissemination This study has received NHS ethical approval (REC reference: 18/SC/0245). The findings from PALS will be disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publications, conferences and workshops in collaboration with our community partners.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere028718
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 1 Aug 2019

Funding

1Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK 2Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK 3NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Wessex, NIHR, Wessex, UK 4Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK 5Academic Unit of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK 6School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK 7Public Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK 8Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, University of Bristol School of Social and Community Medicine, Bristol, UK 9Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK Contributors RB developed the initial idea for the study and obtained funding in collaboration with AR, SE, DC, IV, MCP, LY, RK, CB and the PALS study team. All authors have contributed to the protocol development. RB, TCB, JE and AR have led the trial preparations and development of training materials. IV has lead the development and modification of Genie. SE and DC led the statistical analysis planning, and KB and RK have led the health economics planning. JE, CB and AR have led the qualitative process evaluation planning. RB wrote the initial draft, all subsequent drafts were contributed to by all authors who have approved the final version. Funding This protocol paper summarises independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Public Health Research programme (Grant Reference Number 16/08/41). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Care.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • loneliness
  • protocol
  • randomised controlled trial
  • social isolation
  • social networks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Study protocol for 'The Project about Loneliness and Social networks (PALS)': A pragmatic, randomised trial comparing a facilitated social network intervention (Genie) with a wait-list control for lonely and socially isolated people'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this