Structural Performance of Slim Beam Floor System in Fire

Seng-Kwan Choi, Faris Ali, Ali Nadjai, Sanghoon Han, Joungyoon Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


This paper presents a numerical study that can predict the in-fire performance of slim floor system, composed of asymmetric steel beam, deep steel decking and in-situ concrete slab. The reliability of the proposed numerical model was verified by comparison with experimental results obtained for 4.2m beam tests. A pilot study was also conducted to examine the effect of the cross sectional modification of the steel section on performance enhancement of the model in fire.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-66
JournalJournal of Stuctural Fire Engineering
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 1 Mar 2011

Bibliographical note

Reference text: [1] Schleich, J.B. Slim Floor Construction: Why?, Composite construction – conventional and innovative, 1997, 53-64.
[2] Mullet D.L., Composite Floor Systems, Blackwell Science Ltd, 1998.
[3] Korea National Statistical Office, Population and Housing Census Report, 2005.
[4] Korea Ministry of Construction and Transport, 2006 Statistics for residential environments in high-rise buildings, 2006.
[5] Xiaohua, L., Study on the structural behaviour and composite action in composite slime floor beams, ACTA Polytechnica Scandinavica – Civil engineering and Building Construction Series No. 103, Finland, 1995, 1-87.
[6] Malaska, M., Behaviour of a Semi-continuous Beam-column Connection for composite Slim Floors, Helsinki University of Technology Laboratory of Steel Structures Publications 20, Finland, 2000.
[7] Bode, H. et al, Composite action in slim floor systems, Engineering Foundations: Composite construction in Steel and Concrete III, 1997, 472-785.
[8] Zandonini, R., Gadotti, F. and Fedrizzi, E., Composite steel-concrete systems with slim floor beams: structural performance and design considerations, International conference on advances in structures: steel, concrete, composite and aluminum, 2003, 35-44.
[9] Lawson, R.M., Mullett, D.L., and Rackham, J.W., Design of asymmetric slimflor beams using deep composite decking, SCI publication 175, SCI, 1997.
[10] Mullett, D.L. and Lawson, R.M., Design of slimflor fabricated beams using deep composite decking, SCI publication 248, SCI, 1999.
[11] Latham, D.J., Thomson, G., Kay, T.R. and Preston, R.R., BS476: Part8 Fire Tests on two slim floor assemblies, Swinden Laboratories Report RS/R/S1199/1/86/B, British Steel Corporation, 1986.
[12] Mullett, D.L., Slim floor design and construction, SCI publication 110, SCI, 1992.
[13] Newman, G.M., Fire resistance of slim floor beams, Journal of Constructional Steel, Research, 33, 1995, pp. 87-100.
[14] Lennon, T., Full scale fire test on a slimdek floor system, BRE Client Report TCR 30/99, November 1998.
[15] Najjar, S.R., Three-dimensional analysis of steel frames and subframes in fire, PhD Thesis, University of Sheffield, 1994.
[16] Bailey, C.G., Simulation of the Structural Behaviour of Steel Framed Buildings in Fire, PhD Thesis, University of Sheffield, 1995.
[17] Bailey, C.G., The behaviour of asymmetric slim floor steel beams in fire, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1999, 50 (12), 235-257.
[18] Cai, J., Burgess, I.W., and Plank, R.J., Modelling of asymmetric cross-section members for fire conditions, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2002, 58(3), 389-412.
[19] Ma, Z. and Mäkeläinen, P., Structural behaviour of composite slim floor frames in fire conditions, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2006, 62 (12), 1282-1289.
[20] Korean Standard Association, KSF2257-6 Method of fire resistance test for elements of building construction-Specific requirements for non-loadbearing vertical separating elements, 2004.
[21] Huang, Z., Platten, A., and Roberts, J., Non-linear finite element model to predict temperature histories within reinforced concrete in fires, Building and Environemnt, 1996, 31(2), 109-118.
[22] Purkiss, J.A., Fire Safety Engineering Design of Structures, Butterworth & Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 1996.
[23] European Committee for Standardisation, ENV 1993-1-2: Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures. Part1.2: General Rules: Structural Design for Fire, Brussels, BE, 1993.
[24] European Committee for Standardisation, ENV 1994-1-2: Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures. Part 1.2: General Rules: Structural Fire Design, Brussels, BE, 1994.
[25] Rots, J.G., Kusters, G.M.A and Blaauwendraad, J., The need for fracture mechanics options in finite element models for concrete structures. In: F. Damjanic et al. eds. Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer Aided Analysis and Design of Concrete Structures Part 1., Pineridge Press, 1984, 19-32.
[26] Huang, Z. and Platten, A., Nonlinear finite element analysis of planar reinforced concrete members subjected to fire. ACI Structural Journal 1997, 94(3), 272-282.
[27] Cai, J., Burgess, I.W. and Plank, R.J., A generalised steel/reinforced beam-column element model for fire conditions, Engineering Structures 2003, 25(6), 817-833.
[28] ASCE, Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1984.
[29] Barzegar-Jamshidi, F., Non-linear Finite Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete under Short Term Monotonic Loading, PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1987.


  • asymmetric beam
  • slim floor
  • fire safety
  • structural stability
  • structural modification
  • performance based design method


Dive into the research topics of 'Structural Performance of Slim Beam Floor System in Fire'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this