Stress transfer relations among the earthquakes that occurred in Kerman province, southern Iran since 1981

Suleyman S Nalbant, Sandy Steacy, John McCloskey

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    26 Citations (Scopus)
    27 Downloads (Pure)


    We explore the possible stress triggering relationship of the M >= 6.4 earthquakes that occurred in Kerman Province, southern Iran since 1981. We calculated stress changes due to both co-seismic sudden movement in the upper crust and the time-dependent viscous relaxation of the lower crust and/or upper mantle following the event. Four events of M >= 6.4 occurred between 1981 and 2005, on and close to the Gowk fault, show a clear Coulomb stress load to failure relationship. The 2003 M = 6.5 Bam earthquake, however, which occurred approximately 95 km SW of the closest Gowk event, shows a very weak stress relation to preceding earthquakes. The coseismic static stress change at the hypocentre of the Bam earthquake is quite small (similar to 0.006 bars). The time-dependent post-seismic stress change could be 26 times larger or 7 times lower than that of coseismic static stress alone depending on the choice of viscoelastic crustal model and the effective coefficient of friction. Given the uncertainties in the viscoelastic earth models and the effective coefficient of friction, we cannot confidently conclude that the 2003 Bam event was brought closer to failure through coseismic or post-seismic stress loading. Interestingly, the southern Gowk segment with a similar strike to that of the Bam fault, experienced a stress load of up to 8.3 bars between 1981 and 2003, and is yet to have a damaging earthquake.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)309-318
    JournalGeophysical Journal International
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - Oct 2006


    Dive into the research topics of 'Stress transfer relations among the earthquakes that occurred in Kerman province, southern Iran since 1981'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this