Sticking to Their Guns? The Politics of Arms Decommissioning in Northern Ireland, 1998–2007

David Mitchell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    3 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The problem of how to deal with weapons held by paramilitary groups looms large over recent Northern Irish history. It delayed power-sharing for nine years after the 1998 Agreement and contributed to seismic change in the political landscape, but existing research has failed to adequately account for decommissioning's massive political impact. This article addresses this topic. It probes how the main parties handled the issue of decommissioning after 1998 and how that issue, in turn, affected the parties and party system. A theme throughout is how the parties' contrasting approaches to decommissioning reflected their divergent perspectives on one of the peace process's central, and most controversial, structural features: the inclusion of paramilitary-linked parties. This theme is taken up more directly in the concluding discussion which strives, with the aid of some of the theoretical literature, to tie together the threads from the main analysis and explains why decommissioning had such a dramatic impact on peace implementation in Northern Ireland.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages341-361
    JournalContemporary British History
    Volume24
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2010

    Fingerprint

    the affected party
    paramilitary group
    political impact
    peace process
    party system
    weapon
    peace
    inclusion
    politics
    history
    literature

    Cite this

    @article{2beb5dfb7c6c4e3893ae4b1bce8817da,
    title = "Sticking to Their Guns? The Politics of Arms Decommissioning in Northern Ireland, 1998–2007",
    abstract = "The problem of how to deal with weapons held by paramilitary groups looms large over recent Northern Irish history. It delayed power-sharing for nine years after the 1998 Agreement and contributed to seismic change in the political landscape, but existing research has failed to adequately account for decommissioning's massive political impact. This article addresses this topic. It probes how the main parties handled the issue of decommissioning after 1998 and how that issue, in turn, affected the parties and party system. A theme throughout is how the parties' contrasting approaches to decommissioning reflected their divergent perspectives on one of the peace process's central, and most controversial, structural features: the inclusion of paramilitary-linked parties. This theme is taken up more directly in the concluding discussion which strives, with the aid of some of the theoretical literature, to tie together the threads from the main analysis and explains why decommissioning had such a dramatic impact on peace implementation in Northern Ireland.",
    author = "David Mitchell",
    year = "2010",
    month = "9",
    day = "1",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "341--361",
    journal = "Contemporary British History",
    issn = "1361-9462",
    number = "3",

    }

    Sticking to Their Guns? The Politics of Arms Decommissioning in Northern Ireland, 1998–2007. / Mitchell, David.

    In: Contemporary British History, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.09.2010, p. 341-361.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Sticking to Their Guns? The Politics of Arms Decommissioning in Northern Ireland, 1998–2007

    AU - Mitchell, David

    PY - 2010/9/1

    Y1 - 2010/9/1

    N2 - The problem of how to deal with weapons held by paramilitary groups looms large over recent Northern Irish history. It delayed power-sharing for nine years after the 1998 Agreement and contributed to seismic change in the political landscape, but existing research has failed to adequately account for decommissioning's massive political impact. This article addresses this topic. It probes how the main parties handled the issue of decommissioning after 1998 and how that issue, in turn, affected the parties and party system. A theme throughout is how the parties' contrasting approaches to decommissioning reflected their divergent perspectives on one of the peace process's central, and most controversial, structural features: the inclusion of paramilitary-linked parties. This theme is taken up more directly in the concluding discussion which strives, with the aid of some of the theoretical literature, to tie together the threads from the main analysis and explains why decommissioning had such a dramatic impact on peace implementation in Northern Ireland.

    AB - The problem of how to deal with weapons held by paramilitary groups looms large over recent Northern Irish history. It delayed power-sharing for nine years after the 1998 Agreement and contributed to seismic change in the political landscape, but existing research has failed to adequately account for decommissioning's massive political impact. This article addresses this topic. It probes how the main parties handled the issue of decommissioning after 1998 and how that issue, in turn, affected the parties and party system. A theme throughout is how the parties' contrasting approaches to decommissioning reflected their divergent perspectives on one of the peace process's central, and most controversial, structural features: the inclusion of paramilitary-linked parties. This theme is taken up more directly in the concluding discussion which strives, with the aid of some of the theoretical literature, to tie together the threads from the main analysis and explains why decommissioning had such a dramatic impact on peace implementation in Northern Ireland.

    M3 - Article

    VL - 24

    SP - 341

    EP - 361

    JO - Contemporary British History

    T2 - Contemporary British History

    JF - Contemporary British History

    SN - 1361-9462

    IS - 3

    ER -