‘Starving to Death in Medical Care: Ethics, Food, Emotions and Dying in Britain and America, c.1980-2015’

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent controversies about prisoner force-feeding have renewed debates on the ethical appropriateness of feeding individuals against their will. Critics condemn force-feeding as it seems to clash with prevailing bioethical principles of patient autonomy which grant patients the right to refuse medical treatment (or food) if they wish. This article uses contemporary history to highlight the complex development of policies on supported feeding in recent decades. It maintains that since the late-1970s, doctors and medical personnel have grappled with the problems posed by feeding numerous types of patients (not just hunger strikers) without express permission including the comatose, infants, anorexics and the elderly demented. Between the 1970s and 1990s, inconsistent approaches developed, which regularly negated the principles of patient autonomy. Many doctors and family members struggled emotionally with the prospect of letting an individual starve. Decisions made about whether or not to feed were informed by factors such as age, gender and perceptions of vulnerability. If patient autonomy is to guide decisions made to use, withdraw or withhold nutritional support, it would benefit from being consistently applied. Emotional detachment is essential to achieve this, although emotions, at the same time, present barriers to the implementation of ethical standards in clinical practice.
LanguageEnglish
Pages89-108
JournalBioSocieties
Volume12
Issue number1
Early online date17 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 17 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Medical Ethics
dying
medical care
Emotions
emotion
autonomy
moral philosophy
food
death
Food
Enteral Nutrition
contemporary history
hunger
physician's care
prisoner
Prisoners
Hunger
family member
Nutritional Support
critic

Keywords

  • history of artificial feeding
  • history of nutritional support
  • history of force feeding
  • history of comas
  • history of food

Cite this

@article{edab2070744243249bf2e3e395698160,
title = "‘Starving to Death in Medical Care: Ethics, Food, Emotions and Dying in Britain and America, c.1980-2015’",
abstract = "Recent controversies about prisoner force-feeding have renewed debates on the ethical appropriateness of feeding individuals against their will. Critics condemn force-feeding as it seems to clash with prevailing bioethical principles of patient autonomy which grant patients the right to refuse medical treatment (or food) if they wish. This article uses contemporary history to highlight the complex development of policies on supported feeding in recent decades. It maintains that since the late-1970s, doctors and medical personnel have grappled with the problems posed by feeding numerous types of patients (not just hunger strikers) without express permission including the comatose, infants, anorexics and the elderly demented. Between the 1970s and 1990s, inconsistent approaches developed, which regularly negated the principles of patient autonomy. Many doctors and family members struggled emotionally with the prospect of letting an individual starve. Decisions made about whether or not to feed were informed by factors such as age, gender and perceptions of vulnerability. If patient autonomy is to guide decisions made to use, withdraw or withhold nutritional support, it would benefit from being consistently applied. Emotional detachment is essential to achieve this, although emotions, at the same time, present barriers to the implementation of ethical standards in clinical practice.",
keywords = "history of artificial feeding, history of nutritional support, history of force feeding, history of comas, history of food",
author = "Ian Miller",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1057/s41292-016-0034-z",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "89--108",
journal = "BioSocieties",
issn = "1745-8552",
number = "1",

}

‘Starving to Death in Medical Care: Ethics, Food, Emotions and Dying in Britain and America, c.1980-2015’. / Miller, Ian.

In: BioSocieties, Vol. 12, No. 1, 17.03.2017, p. 89-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Starving to Death in Medical Care: Ethics, Food, Emotions and Dying in Britain and America, c.1980-2015’

AU - Miller, Ian

PY - 2017/3/17

Y1 - 2017/3/17

N2 - Recent controversies about prisoner force-feeding have renewed debates on the ethical appropriateness of feeding individuals against their will. Critics condemn force-feeding as it seems to clash with prevailing bioethical principles of patient autonomy which grant patients the right to refuse medical treatment (or food) if they wish. This article uses contemporary history to highlight the complex development of policies on supported feeding in recent decades. It maintains that since the late-1970s, doctors and medical personnel have grappled with the problems posed by feeding numerous types of patients (not just hunger strikers) without express permission including the comatose, infants, anorexics and the elderly demented. Between the 1970s and 1990s, inconsistent approaches developed, which regularly negated the principles of patient autonomy. Many doctors and family members struggled emotionally with the prospect of letting an individual starve. Decisions made about whether or not to feed were informed by factors such as age, gender and perceptions of vulnerability. If patient autonomy is to guide decisions made to use, withdraw or withhold nutritional support, it would benefit from being consistently applied. Emotional detachment is essential to achieve this, although emotions, at the same time, present barriers to the implementation of ethical standards in clinical practice.

AB - Recent controversies about prisoner force-feeding have renewed debates on the ethical appropriateness of feeding individuals against their will. Critics condemn force-feeding as it seems to clash with prevailing bioethical principles of patient autonomy which grant patients the right to refuse medical treatment (or food) if they wish. This article uses contemporary history to highlight the complex development of policies on supported feeding in recent decades. It maintains that since the late-1970s, doctors and medical personnel have grappled with the problems posed by feeding numerous types of patients (not just hunger strikers) without express permission including the comatose, infants, anorexics and the elderly demented. Between the 1970s and 1990s, inconsistent approaches developed, which regularly negated the principles of patient autonomy. Many doctors and family members struggled emotionally with the prospect of letting an individual starve. Decisions made about whether or not to feed were informed by factors such as age, gender and perceptions of vulnerability. If patient autonomy is to guide decisions made to use, withdraw or withhold nutritional support, it would benefit from being consistently applied. Emotional detachment is essential to achieve this, although emotions, at the same time, present barriers to the implementation of ethical standards in clinical practice.

KW - history of artificial feeding

KW - history of nutritional support

KW - history of force feeding

KW - history of comas

KW - history of food

U2 - 10.1057/s41292-016-0034-z

DO - 10.1057/s41292-016-0034-z

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 89

EP - 108

JO - BioSocieties

T2 - BioSocieties

JF - BioSocieties

SN - 1745-8552

IS - 1

ER -