Standards in regulating quality of adult community health and social care: systematic narrative review

Suzanne Cunningham, Brian Taylor, Audrey Murphy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The growing range and complexity of community care services require robust approaches to ensuring quality. Method: This review collated studies on the use of standards in regulating community health and social care using Social Care Online, MEDLINE and CINAHL databases. Studies were appraised by two reviewers and synthesized by study themes. Results: Sixteen studies were synthesized under three themes: standards in quality assurance and quality improvement; effectiveness of standards; and design of regulatory standards. Standards facilitate providers in self-regulation and enable regulators to support and monitor improvement. Effectiveness of standards depends on their language and interpretation, and on organizational factors. There was little evidence of scales within quality standards. Discussion: There is continuing debate about self-regulation versus external regulation. Social care service regulation requires more research. Conclusion: Regulatory organizations should take note of wider initiatives toward evidence-based practice in the design of quality standards.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457-468
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Evidence-Based Social Work
Volume17
Issue number4
Early online date5 Jun 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2020

Keywords

  • Benchmarking
  • literature
  • quality improvement
  • review
  • standards of care

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Standards in regulating quality of adult community health and social care: systematic narrative review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this