Sport Psychology Consulting Effectiveness: The Sport Psychology Consultant’s Perspective

Lee-Ann Sharp, Ken Hodge

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    42 Citations (Scopus)


    The aim of this study was to examine sport psychology consultants’ (SPCs) perceptions of the influence of SPC characteristics on consultant effectiveness, while determining the conditions necessary for establishing an effective consulting relationship. Thirteen accredited SPCs participated in semi-structured interviews. Thematic content analysis identified three characteristicsof SPC effectiveness: (a) build a connection with the athlete to create positive change, (b) build a professional consulting relationship with athlete, and (c) consulting relationship meets athletes’ needs. Two aspects emerged as essential for an effective consulting relationship: (a) athlete is an active participant, and (b) SPC awareness of client boundaries of confidentiality.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)360-376
    JournalJournal of Applied Sport Psychology
    Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 2011

    Bibliographical note

    Reference text: 1. AASP. 2010. “Code of ethical principles and standards”. Retrieved 10th October, 2010, from
    2. Andersen, M. B. 2000. “Beginnings: Intakes and the initiation of relationships”. In Doing Sport Psychology, Edited by: Andersen, M. B. 3–16. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    3. Andersen, M. B. 2004. “Transference and countertransference”. In Psychology in the physical and manual therapies, Edited by: Kolt, G. S. and Andersen, M. B. 71–80. Edinburgh, , Scotland: Churchill Livingstone. [CrossRef]
    4. Andersen, M. B. 2006. “It's all about sport performance … and something else”. In The Sport Psychologist's Handbook: A Guide for Sport-Specific Performance Enhancement, Edited by: Dosil, J. 687–698. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
    5. Andersen, M. B. and Williams-Rice, B. T. 1996. Supervision in the education and training of sport psychology service providers. The Sport Psychologist, 10: 278–290. [Web of Science ®], [CSA]
    6. Anderson, A., Knowles, Z. and Gilbourne, D. 2004. Reflective practice for sport psychologists: Concepts, models, practical implications, and thoughts on dissemination. The Sport Psychologist, 18: 188–202. [Web of Science ®]
    7. Anderson, A. G., Miles, A., Mahoney, C. and Robinson, P. 2002. Evaluating the effectiveness of applied sport psychology practice: Making the case for a case study approach. The Sport Psychologist, 16: 432–453. [Web of Science ®], [CSA]
    8. Anderson, A., Miles, A., Robinson, P. and Mahoney, C. 2004. Evaluating the athlete's perception of the sport psychologist's effectiveness: What should we be assessing?. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 5: 255–277. [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®]
    9. Barrett-Lennard, G. T. 1962. Dimensions of therapeutic response as causal factors in therapeutic change. Psychological Monographs, (Whole, No.43)
    10. BASES. 2010. “Code of conduct”. Retrieved 10 October, 2010, from
    11. Corbin, J. M. and Strauss, A. L. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, London: Sage.
    12. Cropley, B., Miles, A., Hanton, S. and Niven, A. 2007. Improving the delivery of applied sport psychology support through reflective practice. The Sport Psychologist, 21: 475–494. [Web of Science ®]
    13. Fifer, A., Henschen, K. P., Gould, D. and Ravizza, K. 2008. What works when working with athletes. The Sport Psychologist, 22: 356–377. [Web of Science ®]
    14. Frank, A. F. and Gunderson, J. G. 1990. The role of the therapeutic alliance in the treatment of schizophrenia - Relationship to course and outcome. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47: 228–236. [PubMed], [Web of Science ®]
    15. Gould, D., Murphy, S., Tammen, V. and May, J. 1991. An evaluation of U.S. Olympic sport psychology consultant effectiveness. The Sport Psychologist, 5: 111–127. [CSA]
    16. Hardy, L. and Jones, G. 1994. Current issues and future directions for performance-related research in sport psychology. Journal of Sports Sciences, 12(1): 61–92. [Taylor & Francis Online], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [CSA]
    17. Horvarth, A. O. and Symonds, B. D. 1991. Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 38: 139–149. [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®], [CSA]
    18. Lorimer, R. and Jowett, S. 2009. Empathetic accuracy in coach-athlete dyads who participate in team and individual sports. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10: 152–158. [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®]
    19. Lubker, J. R., Visek, A. J., Geer, J. R. and Watson, J. C. 2008. Characteristics of an effective sport psychology consultant: Perspectives from athletes and consultants. Journal of Sport Behavior, 31: 147–165.
    20. Martindale, A. and Collins, D. 2007. Enhancing the evaluation of effectiveness with professional judgement and decision making. The Sport Psychologist, 21: 458–474. [Web of Science ®]
    21. McCann, S. C. 2000. “Doing sport psychology in the really big show”. In Doing sport psychology, Edited by: Andersen, M. B. 209–277. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    22. Orlick, T. and Partington, J. 1987. The sport psychology consultant: analysis of critical components as viewed by Canadian Olympic athletes. The Sport Psychologist, 1: 4–17. [CSA]
    23. Partington, J. and Orlick, T. 1987. The sport psychology consultant: Olympic coaches' view. The Sport Psychologist, 1(2): 95–102. [CSA]
    24. Petitpas, A. J., Giges, B. and Danish, S. J. 1999. The sport psychologist-athlete relationship: Implications for training. The Sport Psychologist, 13: 344–357. [Web of Science ®], [CSA]
    25. Poczwardowski, A., Sherman, C. P. and Henschen, K. P. 1998. A sport psychology service delivery heuristic: Building on theory and practice. The Sport Psychologist, 12: 191–207. [Web of Science ®], [CSA]
    26. Robson, C. 2002. Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers , 2nd ed., Oxford, , UK: Blackwell Publishers. Madden, Mass.
    27. Rogers, C. R. 1957. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality-change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21: 95–103. [CrossRef], [PubMed]
    28. Ronnestad, M. H. and Skovholt, T. M. 2003. The journey of the counselor and therapist: Research findings and perspectives on professional development. Journal of Career Development, 30: 5–44. [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®]
    29. Sport and Exercise Science New Zealand. 2008. “Code of Ethics”. Retrieved 10th December, 2009, from
    30. Silva, J. M., Conroy, D. E. and Zizzi, S. J. 1999. Critical issues confronting the advancement of applied sport psychology. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11: 298–320. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [CSA]
    31. Sparkes, A. C. 1998. Validity in qualitative inquiry and the problem of criteria: Implications for sport psychology. The Sport Psychologist, 12: 363–386. [Web of Science ®], [CSA]
    32. Stevens, L. M. and Andersen, M. B. 2007. Transference and countertransference in sport psychology service delivery: Part I. A review of erotic attraction. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 19: 253–269. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®]
    33. Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. M. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 2nd Ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    34. Strean, W. B. 1998. Possibilities for qualitative research in sport psychology. The Sport Psychologist, 12: 333 [Web of Science ®], [CSA]
    35. Strean, W. B. and Strean, H. S. 1998. Applying psychodynamic concepts to sport psychology Practice. The Sport Psychologist, 12: 208–222. [Web of Science ®], [CSA]
    36. Tod, D. and Andersen, M. B. 2005. “Success in sport psych: Effective sport psychologists”. In The sport psych handbook, Edited by: Murphy, S. 305–335. Auckland, New Zealand: Human Kinetics.
    37. Van Raalte, J. L. and Andersen, M. B. 2000. “Supervision I: From models to doing”. In Doing sport psychology, Edited by: Andersen, M. B. 153–165. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
    38. Vanden Auweele, V. Y. and Rzwnicki, R. 2000. Putting relationships issues in sport in perspective. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 31: 573–577. [Web of Science ®]
    39. Watson, J., Zizzi, S., Etzel, E. and Lubker, J. 2004. Applied sport psychology supervision: A survey of students and professionals. The Sport Psychologist, 18: 415–429. [Web of Science ®]
    40. Weber, R. 1990. Basic content analyses, London: Sage.
    41. Winstone, W. and Gervis, M. 2006. Countertransference and the self-aware sport psychologist: Attitudes and patterns of professional practice. The Sport Psychologist, 20: 495–511. [Web of Science ®]


    Dive into the research topics of 'Sport Psychology Consulting Effectiveness: The Sport Psychology Consultant’s Perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this