Sport psychology consulting effectiveness: The athlete's perspective

Lee-Ann Sharp, Ken Hodge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate what athletes perceived to be essential for effective sport psychology consulting and to examine athletes’ perceptions of the key components of an effective sport psychology consulting relationship. Nine elite athletes participated in individual semi-structured interviews (6 males and 3 females, mean age = 32.7 years, SD= 11.05, mean competitive experience = 17.9 years, SD= 9.0) from a variety of sports (e.g. cricket, rugby, swimming, triathlon, dressage, and wheelchair rugby). Inductive content analysis indicated that three categories were essential for sport psychology consulting effectiveness; (a) sport psychology consultants (SPCs) were friendly but not a friend; (b) SPC consulting experience; and (c) athlete-centered consulting. Four categories emerged regarding effective consulting relationships: (a) flexibility; (b) open, honest, and respectful; (c) contributions from both the athlete and SPC; and (d) athlete as an active participant in the consulting relationship.Keywords: consulting relationships; working alliance; effectiveness
LanguageEnglish
Pages91-105
JournalInternational Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 May 2014

Fingerprint

Athletes
Consultants
Football
Gryllidae
Wheelchairs
Sports
Sports Psychology
Interviews

Cite this

@article{ddb2d21a5ecb4ae7935fbef95c389bdf,
title = "Sport psychology consulting effectiveness: The athlete's perspective",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to investigate what athletes perceived to be essential for effective sport psychology consulting and to examine athletes’ perceptions of the key components of an effective sport psychology consulting relationship. Nine elite athletes participated in individual semi-structured interviews (6 males and 3 females, mean age = 32.7 years, SD= 11.05, mean competitive experience = 17.9 years, SD= 9.0) from a variety of sports (e.g. cricket, rugby, swimming, triathlon, dressage, and wheelchair rugby). Inductive content analysis indicated that three categories were essential for sport psychology consulting effectiveness; (a) sport psychology consultants (SPCs) were friendly but not a friend; (b) SPC consulting experience; and (c) athlete-centered consulting. Four categories emerged regarding effective consulting relationships: (a) flexibility; (b) open, honest, and respectful; (c) contributions from both the athlete and SPC; and (d) athlete as an active participant in the consulting relationship.Keywords: consulting relationships; working alliance; effectiveness",
author = "Lee-Ann Sharp and Ken Hodge",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1080/1612197X.2013.804285",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "91--105",
journal = "International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology",
issn = "1612-197X",

}

Sport psychology consulting effectiveness: The athlete's perspective. / Sharp, Lee-Ann; Hodge, Ken.

In: International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Vol. 12, 12.05.2014, p. 91-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sport psychology consulting effectiveness: The athlete's perspective

AU - Sharp, Lee-Ann

AU - Hodge, Ken

PY - 2014/5/12

Y1 - 2014/5/12

N2 - The purpose of this study was to investigate what athletes perceived to be essential for effective sport psychology consulting and to examine athletes’ perceptions of the key components of an effective sport psychology consulting relationship. Nine elite athletes participated in individual semi-structured interviews (6 males and 3 females, mean age = 32.7 years, SD= 11.05, mean competitive experience = 17.9 years, SD= 9.0) from a variety of sports (e.g. cricket, rugby, swimming, triathlon, dressage, and wheelchair rugby). Inductive content analysis indicated that three categories were essential for sport psychology consulting effectiveness; (a) sport psychology consultants (SPCs) were friendly but not a friend; (b) SPC consulting experience; and (c) athlete-centered consulting. Four categories emerged regarding effective consulting relationships: (a) flexibility; (b) open, honest, and respectful; (c) contributions from both the athlete and SPC; and (d) athlete as an active participant in the consulting relationship.Keywords: consulting relationships; working alliance; effectiveness

AB - The purpose of this study was to investigate what athletes perceived to be essential for effective sport psychology consulting and to examine athletes’ perceptions of the key components of an effective sport psychology consulting relationship. Nine elite athletes participated in individual semi-structured interviews (6 males and 3 females, mean age = 32.7 years, SD= 11.05, mean competitive experience = 17.9 years, SD= 9.0) from a variety of sports (e.g. cricket, rugby, swimming, triathlon, dressage, and wheelchair rugby). Inductive content analysis indicated that three categories were essential for sport psychology consulting effectiveness; (a) sport psychology consultants (SPCs) were friendly but not a friend; (b) SPC consulting experience; and (c) athlete-centered consulting. Four categories emerged regarding effective consulting relationships: (a) flexibility; (b) open, honest, and respectful; (c) contributions from both the athlete and SPC; and (d) athlete as an active participant in the consulting relationship.Keywords: consulting relationships; working alliance; effectiveness

U2 - 10.1080/1612197X.2013.804285

DO - 10.1080/1612197X.2013.804285

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 91

EP - 105

JO - International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

T2 - International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

JF - International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

SN - 1612-197X

ER -