Somalia and the 'Body-Bag Myth' in American Politics.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to afford a full explanation as to why the |[lsquo]|Somalia incident|[rsquo]| had such a massive impact on US politics and subsequent foreign policy decisions. Why did the raid elicit such a storm of criticism when similar operations such as Beirut (1983), Grenada (1983), Panama (1989), and the Gulf War (1991) did not? Was it because of a negative US public? Was it shock on the part of the Executive or Legislative Branches? Was it because of extreme pressure from one of America's most conservative power bases, the military? Or could it be, that sensing a potential threat to domestic concerns, a Clinton Administration, whose commitment to multilateralism was more diaphanous than dynamic, simply abandoned its policy to the spears, of its critics?
LanguageEnglish
Pages552-571
JournalInternational Politics
Volume44
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Grenada
gulf war
multilateralism
Panama
Somalia
foreign policy
critic
myth
incident
criticism
Military
commitment
threat
politics

Cite this

@article{c56f094eca07493f9e7f23dc1385fa4a,
title = "Somalia and the 'Body-Bag Myth' in American Politics.",
abstract = "The purpose of this article is to afford a full explanation as to why the |[lsquo]|Somalia incident|[rsquo]| had such a massive impact on US politics and subsequent foreign policy decisions. Why did the raid elicit such a storm of criticism when similar operations such as Beirut (1983), Grenada (1983), Panama (1989), and the Gulf War (1991) did not? Was it because of a negative US public? Was it shock on the part of the Executive or Legislative Branches? Was it because of extreme pressure from one of America's most conservative power bases, the military? Or could it be, that sensing a potential threat to domestic concerns, a Clinton Administration, whose commitment to multilateralism was more diaphanous than dynamic, simply abandoned its policy to the spears, of its critics?",
author = "Leonie Murray",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "552--571",
journal = "International Politics",
issn = "1384-5748",

}

Somalia and the 'Body-Bag Myth' in American Politics. / Murray, Leonie.

In: International Politics, Vol. 44, 01.09.2007, p. 552-571.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Somalia and the 'Body-Bag Myth' in American Politics.

AU - Murray, Leonie

PY - 2007/9/1

Y1 - 2007/9/1

N2 - The purpose of this article is to afford a full explanation as to why the |[lsquo]|Somalia incident|[rsquo]| had such a massive impact on US politics and subsequent foreign policy decisions. Why did the raid elicit such a storm of criticism when similar operations such as Beirut (1983), Grenada (1983), Panama (1989), and the Gulf War (1991) did not? Was it because of a negative US public? Was it shock on the part of the Executive or Legislative Branches? Was it because of extreme pressure from one of America's most conservative power bases, the military? Or could it be, that sensing a potential threat to domestic concerns, a Clinton Administration, whose commitment to multilateralism was more diaphanous than dynamic, simply abandoned its policy to the spears, of its critics?

AB - The purpose of this article is to afford a full explanation as to why the |[lsquo]|Somalia incident|[rsquo]| had such a massive impact on US politics and subsequent foreign policy decisions. Why did the raid elicit such a storm of criticism when similar operations such as Beirut (1983), Grenada (1983), Panama (1989), and the Gulf War (1991) did not? Was it because of a negative US public? Was it shock on the part of the Executive or Legislative Branches? Was it because of extreme pressure from one of America's most conservative power bases, the military? Or could it be, that sensing a potential threat to domestic concerns, a Clinton Administration, whose commitment to multilateralism was more diaphanous than dynamic, simply abandoned its policy to the spears, of its critics?

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 552

EP - 571

JO - International Politics

T2 - International Politics

JF - International Politics

SN - 1384-5748

ER -