Activities per year
This article examines judicial reviews of two areas of social security policy and practice in the UK – the household benefit cap and the restriction of bereavement benefits to bereaved spouses and civil partners. While each case ostensibly concerned discrimination against claimants, in practice much of the legal argument centred on the impact on claimants’ children. The judiciary is revealed to be deeply divided on the lawfulness of the acknowledged discrimination. The article considers what lessons can be drawn about the relative weight that ought to be afforded to claimants’ property rights, the best interests of affected children, anti-discrimination provisions and the state’s stated policy imperatives of cost control and administrative convenience. Insights are also sought into whether devolutionary differences can be identified between the approaches of courts in London and Belfast.
- Social security
- Human Rights
- European Convention on Human Rights
- Convention on the Rights of the Child
- Social rights
- Welfare state
Simpson, M., 22 Mar 2019, In: Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 41, 2, p. 218-221 4 p.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debateOpen AccessFile36 Downloads (Pure)
Simpson, M., 6 Jun 2018.
Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper
United Nations Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights visit to the UK: submission of evidenceSimpson, M., McKeever, G., Gray, A. & Fitzpatrick, C., Sep 2018, 8 p.
Research output: Other contributionOpen AccessFile