Social rights, child rights, discrimination and devolution: untangling the web

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines judicial reviews of two areas of social security policy and practice in the UK – the household benefit cap and the restriction of bereavement benefits to bereaved spouses and civil partners. While each case ostensibly concerned discrimination against claimants, in practice much of the legal argument centred on the impact on claimants’ children. The judiciary is revealed to be deeply divided on the lawfulness of the acknowledged discrimination. The article considers what lessons can be drawn about the relative weight that ought to be afforded to claimants’ property rights, the best interests of affected children, anti-discrimination provisions and the state’s stated policy imperatives of cost control and administrative convenience. Insights are also sought into whether devolutionary differences can be identified between the approaches of courts in London and Belfast.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3-20
JournalJournal of Social Welfare and Family Law
Volume40
Issue number1
Early online date6 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 6 Mar 2018

Keywords

  • Social security
  • Human Rights
  • European Convention on Human Rights
  • Convention on the Rights of the Child
  • Devolution
  • Social rights
  • Welfare state

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Social rights, child rights, discrimination and devolution: untangling the web'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Activities

    • 1 Oral presentation

    Exploring the child's right to social security

    Mark Simpson (Speaker)

    28 Mar 2018

    Activity: Talk or presentationOral presentation

    File

    Research Output

    • 4 Citations
    • 1 Paper
    • 1 Comment/debate
    • 1 Other contribution

    Discrimination in death? Unmarried couples and bereavement benefits

    Simpson, M., 22 Mar 2019, In : Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 41, 2, p. 218-221 4 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

    Open Access
    File
  • 3 Downloads (Pure)
  • Open Access
    File
  • Cite this