Abstract
A strong predictor of children’s language is performance on non-word repetition (NWR) tasks. However, the basis of this relationship remains unknown. Some suggest that NWR tasks measure phonological working memory, which then affects language growth. Others argue that children’s knowledge of language/language experience affects NWR performance. A complicating factor is that most studies focus on school-aged children, who have already mastered key language skills. Here, we present a new NWR task for English-learning 2-year-olds, use it to assess the effect of NWR performance on concurrent and later vocabulary development, and compare the children’s performance with that of an experience-based computational model (CLASSIC).The new NWR task produced reliable results; replicating word likeness effects, word-length effects, and the relationship with concurrent and later language ability we seeing older children. The model also simulated all effects, suggesting that the relationship between vocabulary and NWR performance can be explained by language experience-/knowledge-based theories
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 379-423 |
| Number of pages | 45 |
| Journal | Language Learning |
| Volume | 75 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 10 Sept 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 30 Jun 2025 |
Bibliographical note
© 2024 The Author(s). Language Learning published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Language Learning Research Club, University of Michigan.Funding
Research funding: Economic and Social Research Council. Grant Number: ES/L008955/1 Article funding: Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Keywords
- vocabulary development
- non-word repetition
- syntax development
- phono-logical working memory
- computational modelling
- CLASSIC
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Simulating the Relationship Between Nonword Repetition Performance and Vocabulary Growth in 2‐Year‐Olds: Evidence From the Language 0–5 Project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver