Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct Control

Juliana Gerard, Jeffrey Lidz, Shalom Zuckerman, Manuela Pinto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previous research on the acquisition of adjunct control has observed non-adultlike behavior for sentences like “John bumped Mary after tripping on the sidewalk.” While adults only allow a subject control interpretation for these sentences (that John tripped on the sidewalk), preschool-aged children have been reported to allow a much wider range of interpretations. A number of different tasks have been used with the aim of identifying a grammatical source of children’s errors. In this paper, we consider the role of extragrammatical factors. In two comprehension experiments, we demonstrate that error rates go up when the similarity increases between an antecedent and a linearly intervening noun phrase, first with similarity in gender, and next with similarity in number marking. This suggests that difficulties with adjunct control are to be explained (at least in part) by the sentence processing mechanisms that underlie similarity-based interference in adults.
LanguageEnglish
Number of pages15
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

crossover interference
preschool children
gender

Keywords

  • adjunct control
  • language acquisition
  • similarity-based interference
  • intervention
  • binding
  • anaphora

Cite this

Gerard, Juliana ; Lidz, Jeffrey ; Zuckerman, Shalom ; Pinto, Manuela. / Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct Control. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2017 ; Vol. 8.
@article{27e217abe3c046bc8590b46373b8887f,
title = "Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct Control",
abstract = "Previous research on the acquisition of adjunct control has observed non-adultlike behavior for sentences like “John bumped Mary after tripping on the sidewalk.” While adults only allow a subject control interpretation for these sentences (that John tripped on the sidewalk), preschool-aged children have been reported to allow a much wider range of interpretations. A number of different tasks have been used with the aim of identifying a grammatical source of children’s errors. In this paper, we consider the role of extragrammatical factors. In two comprehension experiments, we demonstrate that error rates go up when the similarity increases between an antecedent and a linearly intervening noun phrase, first with similarity in gender, and next with similarity in number marking. This suggests that difficulties with adjunct control are to be explained (at least in part) by the sentence processing mechanisms that underlie similarity-based interference in adults.",
keywords = "adjunct control, language acquisition, similarity-based interference, intervention, binding, anaphora",
author = "Juliana Gerard and Jeffrey Lidz and Shalom Zuckerman and Manuela Pinto",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "18",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01822",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",

}

Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct Control. / Gerard, Juliana; Lidz, Jeffrey; Zuckerman, Shalom; Pinto, Manuela.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8, 18.10.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Similarity-Based Interference and the Acquisition of Adjunct Control

AU - Gerard, Juliana

AU - Lidz, Jeffrey

AU - Zuckerman, Shalom

AU - Pinto, Manuela

PY - 2017/10/18

Y1 - 2017/10/18

N2 - Previous research on the acquisition of adjunct control has observed non-adultlike behavior for sentences like “John bumped Mary after tripping on the sidewalk.” While adults only allow a subject control interpretation for these sentences (that John tripped on the sidewalk), preschool-aged children have been reported to allow a much wider range of interpretations. A number of different tasks have been used with the aim of identifying a grammatical source of children’s errors. In this paper, we consider the role of extragrammatical factors. In two comprehension experiments, we demonstrate that error rates go up when the similarity increases between an antecedent and a linearly intervening noun phrase, first with similarity in gender, and next with similarity in number marking. This suggests that difficulties with adjunct control are to be explained (at least in part) by the sentence processing mechanisms that underlie similarity-based interference in adults.

AB - Previous research on the acquisition of adjunct control has observed non-adultlike behavior for sentences like “John bumped Mary after tripping on the sidewalk.” While adults only allow a subject control interpretation for these sentences (that John tripped on the sidewalk), preschool-aged children have been reported to allow a much wider range of interpretations. A number of different tasks have been used with the aim of identifying a grammatical source of children’s errors. In this paper, we consider the role of extragrammatical factors. In two comprehension experiments, we demonstrate that error rates go up when the similarity increases between an antecedent and a linearly intervening noun phrase, first with similarity in gender, and next with similarity in number marking. This suggests that difficulties with adjunct control are to be explained (at least in part) by the sentence processing mechanisms that underlie similarity-based interference in adults.

KW - adjunct control

KW - language acquisition

KW - similarity-based interference

KW - intervention

KW - binding

KW - anaphora

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01822

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01822

M3 - Article

VL - 8

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

T2 - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

ER -