Shoulder and hip roll differences between breathing and non-breathing conditions in front crawl swimming

Stelios Psycharakis, Carla McCabe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effects of breathing on body roll have been previously investigated for the roll of the whole trunk only. The purposes of this study were: to calculate separately the shoulder roll (SR) and hip roll (HR) of swimmers during front crawl for non-breathing and preferred-side breathing conditions; to assess the differences in the magnitude and temporal characteristics of these variables between non-breathing and preferred-side breathing conditions; and to examine their association with swimming performance (indicated by swimming speed). Twelve male swimmers who competed at national and internationallevel performed two maximum 25 m front crawl trials: one non-breathing and one with breathing to their preferred side. Performance was recorded with four below and two above water synchronised cameras. SR and HR in both trials were calculated for the breathing and non-breathing sides. The timings of SR and HR peaks to each side and at the positions of neutral roll were also calculated. Swimming speed was significantly slower in the breathing trial (p
LanguageEnglish
Pages1752-1756
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume44
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jun 2011

Fingerprint

hips
shoulders
breathing
cameras

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Kinematics
  • Body Roll
  • Breath-holding
  • Swimming Speed

Cite this

@article{fe7405f90f6b41b687f6ecfb21b3c2f6,
title = "Shoulder and hip roll differences between breathing and non-breathing conditions in front crawl swimming",
abstract = "The effects of breathing on body roll have been previously investigated for the roll of the whole trunk only. The purposes of this study were: to calculate separately the shoulder roll (SR) and hip roll (HR) of swimmers during front crawl for non-breathing and preferred-side breathing conditions; to assess the differences in the magnitude and temporal characteristics of these variables between non-breathing and preferred-side breathing conditions; and to examine their association with swimming performance (indicated by swimming speed). Twelve male swimmers who competed at national and internationallevel performed two maximum 25 m front crawl trials: one non-breathing and one with breathing to their preferred side. Performance was recorded with four below and two above water synchronised cameras. SR and HR in both trials were calculated for the breathing and non-breathing sides. The timings of SR and HR peaks to each side and at the positions of neutral roll were also calculated. Swimming speed was significantly slower in the breathing trial (p",
keywords = "Biomechanics, Kinematics, Body Roll, Breath-holding, Swimming Speed",
author = "Stelios Psycharakis and Carla McCabe",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.004",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "1752--1756",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "9",

}

Shoulder and hip roll differences between breathing and non-breathing conditions in front crawl swimming. / Psycharakis, Stelios; McCabe, Carla.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 44, No. 9, 03.06.2011, p. 1752-1756.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shoulder and hip roll differences between breathing and non-breathing conditions in front crawl swimming

AU - Psycharakis, Stelios

AU - McCabe, Carla

PY - 2011/6/3

Y1 - 2011/6/3

N2 - The effects of breathing on body roll have been previously investigated for the roll of the whole trunk only. The purposes of this study were: to calculate separately the shoulder roll (SR) and hip roll (HR) of swimmers during front crawl for non-breathing and preferred-side breathing conditions; to assess the differences in the magnitude and temporal characteristics of these variables between non-breathing and preferred-side breathing conditions; and to examine their association with swimming performance (indicated by swimming speed). Twelve male swimmers who competed at national and internationallevel performed two maximum 25 m front crawl trials: one non-breathing and one with breathing to their preferred side. Performance was recorded with four below and two above water synchronised cameras. SR and HR in both trials were calculated for the breathing and non-breathing sides. The timings of SR and HR peaks to each side and at the positions of neutral roll were also calculated. Swimming speed was significantly slower in the breathing trial (p

AB - The effects of breathing on body roll have been previously investigated for the roll of the whole trunk only. The purposes of this study were: to calculate separately the shoulder roll (SR) and hip roll (HR) of swimmers during front crawl for non-breathing and preferred-side breathing conditions; to assess the differences in the magnitude and temporal characteristics of these variables between non-breathing and preferred-side breathing conditions; and to examine their association with swimming performance (indicated by swimming speed). Twelve male swimmers who competed at national and internationallevel performed two maximum 25 m front crawl trials: one non-breathing and one with breathing to their preferred side. Performance was recorded with four below and two above water synchronised cameras. SR and HR in both trials were calculated for the breathing and non-breathing sides. The timings of SR and HR peaks to each side and at the positions of neutral roll were also calculated. Swimming speed was significantly slower in the breathing trial (p

KW - Biomechanics

KW - Kinematics

KW - Body Roll

KW - Breath-holding

KW - Swimming Speed

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.004

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 1752

EP - 1756

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

T2 - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

IS - 9

ER -