Should we share qualitative data? Epistemological and practical insights from conversation analysis

Jack B. Joyce, Tom Douglass, Bethan Benwell, Catrin S. Rhys, Ruth Parry, Richard Simmons, Adrian Kerrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Over the last 30 years, there has been substantial debate about the practical, ethical and epistemological issues uniquely associated with qualitative data sharing. In this paper, we contribute to these debates by examining established data sharing practices in Conversation Analysis (CA). CA is an approach to the analysis of social interaction that relies on audio/video recordings of naturally occurring human interactions and moreover works at a level of detail that presents challenges for assumptions about participant anonymity. Nonetheless, data sharing occupies a central position in both the methodology and the wider academic culture of CA as a discipline and a community. Despite this, CA has largely been ignored in qualitative data sharing debates and discussions. We argue that the methodological traditions of CA present a strong case for the value of qualitative data sharing and offer open data sharing practices that might be usefully adopted in other qualitative approaches.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology
Early online date13 Jun 2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Jun 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • General Social Sciences
  • Data sharing
  • conversation analysis
  • qualitative data
  • Open Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should we share qualitative data? Epistemological and practical insights from conversation analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this