Serving size guidance for consumers: is it effective?

G. P. Faulkner, Kirsty Pourshahidi, JMW Wallace, Maeve Kerr, Tracy McCrorie, Barbara Livingstone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Larger portion sizes (PS) may be inciting over-eating and contributing to obesity rates. Currently, there is a paucity of data on the effectiveness of serving size (SS) guidance. The aims of the present review are to evaluate SS guidance; the understanding, usability and acceptability of such guidance, its impact on consumers and potential barriers to its uptake. A sample of worldwide SS guidance schemes (n 87) were identified using targeted and untargeted searches, overall these were found to communicate various inconsistent and often conflicting messages about PS selection. The available data suggest that consumers have difficulty in understanding terms such as ‘portion size’ and ‘serving size’, as these tend to be used interchangeably. In addition, discrepancies between recommended SS and those present on food labels add to the confusion. Consumers generally understand and visualise SS best when expressed in terms of household measures rather than actual weights. Only a limited number of studies have examined the direct impact of SS guidance on consumer behaviour with equivocal results. Although consumers recognise that guidance on selecting SS would be helpful, they are often unwilling to act on such guidance. The challenge of achieving consumer adherence to SS guidance is formidable due to several barriers including chronic exposure to larger PS, distorted consumption norms and perceptions, the habit of ‘cleaning one's plate’ and language barriers for ethnic minorities. In conclusion, the impact of SS guidance on consumers merits further investigation to ensure that future guidance resonates with consumers by being more understandable, usable and acceptable.
LanguageEnglish
Pages610-621
JournalPROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY
Volume71
Issue number4
Early online date9 Aug 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

size selection
consumption behavior
ethnic minority
obesity
food
exposure
norm
rate
consumption
household

Cite this

@article{aff5672e32aa44938108db0e1e8563ef,
title = "Serving size guidance for consumers: is it effective?",
abstract = "Larger portion sizes (PS) may be inciting over-eating and contributing to obesity rates. Currently, there is a paucity of data on the effectiveness of serving size (SS) guidance. The aims of the present review are to evaluate SS guidance; the understanding, usability and acceptability of such guidance, its impact on consumers and potential barriers to its uptake. A sample of worldwide SS guidance schemes (n 87) were identified using targeted and untargeted searches, overall these were found to communicate various inconsistent and often conflicting messages about PS selection. The available data suggest that consumers have difficulty in understanding terms such as ‘portion size’ and ‘serving size’, as these tend to be used interchangeably. In addition, discrepancies between recommended SS and those present on food labels add to the confusion. Consumers generally understand and visualise SS best when expressed in terms of household measures rather than actual weights. Only a limited number of studies have examined the direct impact of SS guidance on consumer behaviour with equivocal results. Although consumers recognise that guidance on selecting SS would be helpful, they are often unwilling to act on such guidance. The challenge of achieving consumer adherence to SS guidance is formidable due to several barriers including chronic exposure to larger PS, distorted consumption norms and perceptions, the habit of ‘cleaning one's plate’ and language barriers for ethnic minorities. In conclusion, the impact of SS guidance on consumers merits further investigation to ensure that future guidance resonates with consumers by being more understandable, usable and acceptable.",
author = "Faulkner, {G. P.} and Kirsty Pourshahidi and JMW Wallace and Maeve Kerr and Tracy McCrorie and Barbara Livingstone",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1017/S0029665112000766",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "610--621",
journal = "Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.",
issn = "0029-6651",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Serving size guidance for consumers: is it effective? / Faulkner, G. P.; Pourshahidi, Kirsty; Wallace, JMW; Kerr, Maeve; McCrorie, Tracy; Livingstone, Barbara.

In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, Vol. 71, No. 4, 11.2012, p. 610-621.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Serving size guidance for consumers: is it effective?

AU - Faulkner, G. P.

AU - Pourshahidi, Kirsty

AU - Wallace, JMW

AU - Kerr, Maeve

AU - McCrorie, Tracy

AU - Livingstone, Barbara

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Larger portion sizes (PS) may be inciting over-eating and contributing to obesity rates. Currently, there is a paucity of data on the effectiveness of serving size (SS) guidance. The aims of the present review are to evaluate SS guidance; the understanding, usability and acceptability of such guidance, its impact on consumers and potential barriers to its uptake. A sample of worldwide SS guidance schemes (n 87) were identified using targeted and untargeted searches, overall these were found to communicate various inconsistent and often conflicting messages about PS selection. The available data suggest that consumers have difficulty in understanding terms such as ‘portion size’ and ‘serving size’, as these tend to be used interchangeably. In addition, discrepancies between recommended SS and those present on food labels add to the confusion. Consumers generally understand and visualise SS best when expressed in terms of household measures rather than actual weights. Only a limited number of studies have examined the direct impact of SS guidance on consumer behaviour with equivocal results. Although consumers recognise that guidance on selecting SS would be helpful, they are often unwilling to act on such guidance. The challenge of achieving consumer adherence to SS guidance is formidable due to several barriers including chronic exposure to larger PS, distorted consumption norms and perceptions, the habit of ‘cleaning one's plate’ and language barriers for ethnic minorities. In conclusion, the impact of SS guidance on consumers merits further investigation to ensure that future guidance resonates with consumers by being more understandable, usable and acceptable.

AB - Larger portion sizes (PS) may be inciting over-eating and contributing to obesity rates. Currently, there is a paucity of data on the effectiveness of serving size (SS) guidance. The aims of the present review are to evaluate SS guidance; the understanding, usability and acceptability of such guidance, its impact on consumers and potential barriers to its uptake. A sample of worldwide SS guidance schemes (n 87) were identified using targeted and untargeted searches, overall these were found to communicate various inconsistent and often conflicting messages about PS selection. The available data suggest that consumers have difficulty in understanding terms such as ‘portion size’ and ‘serving size’, as these tend to be used interchangeably. In addition, discrepancies between recommended SS and those present on food labels add to the confusion. Consumers generally understand and visualise SS best when expressed in terms of household measures rather than actual weights. Only a limited number of studies have examined the direct impact of SS guidance on consumer behaviour with equivocal results. Although consumers recognise that guidance on selecting SS would be helpful, they are often unwilling to act on such guidance. The challenge of achieving consumer adherence to SS guidance is formidable due to several barriers including chronic exposure to larger PS, distorted consumption norms and perceptions, the habit of ‘cleaning one's plate’ and language barriers for ethnic minorities. In conclusion, the impact of SS guidance on consumers merits further investigation to ensure that future guidance resonates with consumers by being more understandable, usable and acceptable.

U2 - 10.1017/S0029665112000766

DO - 10.1017/S0029665112000766

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 610

EP - 621

JO - Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

T2 - Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

JF - Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

SN - 0029-6651

IS - 4

ER -