Scientific Method and the Crimes of the Powerful

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over the past six decades researchers interested in the crimes of the powerful have developed a respectable body of literature. Owing to the empirical and theoretical richness of these contributions, the crimes of the powerful sub-field is ready for critical interventions to be made on the plane of scientific method. Moreover, such interventions have become increasingly necessary owing to the disciplinary hegemony of an orthodox empiricist approach which erects a problematic boundary between empirical representations of the crimes of the powerful and theoretical explanation. To aid a critique of this approach, this paper will employ the scientific framework of classical Marxism to decipher the peculiar problems which flow out of the orthodoxy’s method. It will be concluded that while classical Marxism offers a more rigorous framework for penetrating analyses of the crimes of the powerful, orthodox scholars have nevertheless made significant contributions which should also be utilised in future research.
LanguageEnglish
Pages211-228
JournalCritical Criminology
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Apr 2010

Fingerprint

offense
Marxism
hegemony

Cite this

@article{a189735e19a141ca8541fffcc1d4d844,
title = "Scientific Method and the Crimes of the Powerful",
abstract = "Over the past six decades researchers interested in the crimes of the powerful have developed a respectable body of literature. Owing to the empirical and theoretical richness of these contributions, the crimes of the powerful sub-field is ready for critical interventions to be made on the plane of scientific method. Moreover, such interventions have become increasingly necessary owing to the disciplinary hegemony of an orthodox empiricist approach which erects a problematic boundary between empirical representations of the crimes of the powerful and theoretical explanation. To aid a critique of this approach, this paper will employ the scientific framework of classical Marxism to decipher the peculiar problems which flow out of the orthodoxy’s method. It will be concluded that while classical Marxism offers a more rigorous framework for penetrating analyses of the crimes of the powerful, orthodox scholars have nevertheless made significant contributions which should also be utilised in future research.",
author = "Kristian Lasslett",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1007/s10612-010-9100-1",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "211--228",
journal = "Critical Criminology",
issn = "1205-8629",
number = "3",

}

Scientific Method and the Crimes of the Powerful. / Lasslett, Kristian.

In: Critical Criminology, Vol. 18, No. 3, 23.04.2010, p. 211-228.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientific Method and the Crimes of the Powerful

AU - Lasslett, Kristian

PY - 2010/4/23

Y1 - 2010/4/23

N2 - Over the past six decades researchers interested in the crimes of the powerful have developed a respectable body of literature. Owing to the empirical and theoretical richness of these contributions, the crimes of the powerful sub-field is ready for critical interventions to be made on the plane of scientific method. Moreover, such interventions have become increasingly necessary owing to the disciplinary hegemony of an orthodox empiricist approach which erects a problematic boundary between empirical representations of the crimes of the powerful and theoretical explanation. To aid a critique of this approach, this paper will employ the scientific framework of classical Marxism to decipher the peculiar problems which flow out of the orthodoxy’s method. It will be concluded that while classical Marxism offers a more rigorous framework for penetrating analyses of the crimes of the powerful, orthodox scholars have nevertheless made significant contributions which should also be utilised in future research.

AB - Over the past six decades researchers interested in the crimes of the powerful have developed a respectable body of literature. Owing to the empirical and theoretical richness of these contributions, the crimes of the powerful sub-field is ready for critical interventions to be made on the plane of scientific method. Moreover, such interventions have become increasingly necessary owing to the disciplinary hegemony of an orthodox empiricist approach which erects a problematic boundary between empirical representations of the crimes of the powerful and theoretical explanation. To aid a critique of this approach, this paper will employ the scientific framework of classical Marxism to decipher the peculiar problems which flow out of the orthodoxy’s method. It will be concluded that while classical Marxism offers a more rigorous framework for penetrating analyses of the crimes of the powerful, orthodox scholars have nevertheless made significant contributions which should also be utilised in future research.

U2 - 10.1007/s10612-010-9100-1

DO - 10.1007/s10612-010-9100-1

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 211

EP - 228

JO - Critical Criminology

T2 - Critical Criminology

JF - Critical Criminology

SN - 1205-8629

IS - 3

ER -