Science, God and Ockham’s razor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In discussions about the existence of God, it is sometimes claimed that the progress of science has removed the need for God. This paper uses a Bayesian analysis of Ockham’s razor to formulate and evaluate this argument, which is referred to as the science explains away God argument (SEAGA). Four different strategies for responding to this argument are presented and evaluated. It is arguedthat one of these strategies highlights how difficult it is to show that the conditions for applying Ockham’s razor are satisfied and hence why SEAGA is very unlikely to succeed.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1145-1161
Number of pages17
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Volume174
Issue number5
Early online date20 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2017

Fingerprint

Deity
Existence of God
Bayesian Analysis

Keywords

  • Explaining away
  • Ockham’s razor
  • Bayesian reasoning
  • Atheism

Cite this

Glass, David H. / Science, God and Ockham’s razor. In: Philosophical Studies. 2017 ; Vol. 174, No. 5. pp. 1145-1161.
@article{fa4c1269ece54ae4aad802d4de3d7846,
title = "Science, God and Ockham’s razor",
abstract = "In discussions about the existence of God, it is sometimes claimed that the progress of science has removed the need for God. This paper uses a Bayesian analysis of Ockham’s razor to formulate and evaluate this argument, which is referred to as the science explains away God argument (SEAGA). Four different strategies for responding to this argument are presented and evaluated. It is arguedthat one of these strategies highlights how difficult it is to show that the conditions for applying Ockham’s razor are satisfied and hence why SEAGA is very unlikely to succeed.",
keywords = "Explaining away, Ockham’s razor, Bayesian reasoning, Atheism",
author = "Glass, {David H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s11098-016-0747-7",
language = "English",
volume = "174",
pages = "1145--1161",
journal = "Philosophical Studies",
issn = "0031-8116",
number = "5",

}

Science, God and Ockham’s razor. / Glass, David H.

In: Philosophical Studies, Vol. 174, No. 5, 05.2017, p. 1145-1161.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Science, God and Ockham’s razor

AU - Glass, David H.

PY - 2017/5

Y1 - 2017/5

N2 - In discussions about the existence of God, it is sometimes claimed that the progress of science has removed the need for God. This paper uses a Bayesian analysis of Ockham’s razor to formulate and evaluate this argument, which is referred to as the science explains away God argument (SEAGA). Four different strategies for responding to this argument are presented and evaluated. It is arguedthat one of these strategies highlights how difficult it is to show that the conditions for applying Ockham’s razor are satisfied and hence why SEAGA is very unlikely to succeed.

AB - In discussions about the existence of God, it is sometimes claimed that the progress of science has removed the need for God. This paper uses a Bayesian analysis of Ockham’s razor to formulate and evaluate this argument, which is referred to as the science explains away God argument (SEAGA). Four different strategies for responding to this argument are presented and evaluated. It is arguedthat one of these strategies highlights how difficult it is to show that the conditions for applying Ockham’s razor are satisfied and hence why SEAGA is very unlikely to succeed.

KW - Explaining away

KW - Ockham’s razor

KW - Bayesian reasoning

KW - Atheism

U2 - 10.1007/s11098-016-0747-7

DO - 10.1007/s11098-016-0747-7

M3 - Article

VL - 174

SP - 1145

EP - 1161

JO - Philosophical Studies

T2 - Philosophical Studies

JF - Philosophical Studies

SN - 0031-8116

IS - 5

ER -