Rumour and decertification in Exile Politics: Evidence from the Egyptian Case

David Mc Keever

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Does exile affect activism and if so how? In this paper, the case of Egyptian activists exiled in England is taken as illustrative of processes typical of exiled activism. The case study draws on primary and secondary sources including a series of biographical interviews with exiled activists. The analysis compares activism in Egypt with exiled activism in England using the participants’ critical self-reflections to explain the mechanisms mediating the changes. Contrary to reasonable expectations that exile is a spontaneous response to a change in political context, the conditions for exile predate banishment and lie within the institutions of dictatorship which decertify activism. Decertification continues throughout the exile process as fear of repression becomes internalized within the movement. Within the sanctuary of the host country, a process of brokerage counteracts decertification expanding and modifying the exile repertoire.

LanguageEnglish
JournalGlobalizations
Early online date4 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 4 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

rumor
exile
politics
evidence
sanctuary
dictatorship
reflexivity
repression
Egypt
analysis
Rumor
Activism
anxiety
interview

Keywords

  • Social movements
  • exile
  • rumour
  • decertification
  • contentious politics
  • Arab Spring

Cite this

@article{2bf1a7a2f70c47818aaab48f292f6dfc,
title = "Rumour and decertification in Exile Politics: Evidence from the Egyptian Case",
abstract = "Does exile affect activism and if so how? In this paper, the case of Egyptian activists exiled in England is taken as illustrative of processes typical of exiled activism. The case study draws on primary and secondary sources including a series of biographical interviews with exiled activists. The analysis compares activism in Egypt with exiled activism in England using the participants’ critical self-reflections to explain the mechanisms mediating the changes. Contrary to reasonable expectations that exile is a spontaneous response to a change in political context, the conditions for exile predate banishment and lie within the institutions of dictatorship which decertify activism. Decertification continues throughout the exile process as fear of repression becomes internalized within the movement. Within the sanctuary of the host country, a process of brokerage counteracts decertification expanding and modifying the exile repertoire.",
keywords = "Social movements, exile, rumour, decertification, contentious politics, Arab Spring",
author = "{Mc Keever}, David",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/14747731.2019.1586116",
language = "English",

}

Rumour and decertification in Exile Politics : Evidence from the Egyptian Case. / Mc Keever, David.

04.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rumour and decertification in Exile Politics

T2 - Evidence from the Egyptian Case

AU - Mc Keever, David

PY - 2019/3/4

Y1 - 2019/3/4

N2 - Does exile affect activism and if so how? In this paper, the case of Egyptian activists exiled in England is taken as illustrative of processes typical of exiled activism. The case study draws on primary and secondary sources including a series of biographical interviews with exiled activists. The analysis compares activism in Egypt with exiled activism in England using the participants’ critical self-reflections to explain the mechanisms mediating the changes. Contrary to reasonable expectations that exile is a spontaneous response to a change in political context, the conditions for exile predate banishment and lie within the institutions of dictatorship which decertify activism. Decertification continues throughout the exile process as fear of repression becomes internalized within the movement. Within the sanctuary of the host country, a process of brokerage counteracts decertification expanding and modifying the exile repertoire.

AB - Does exile affect activism and if so how? In this paper, the case of Egyptian activists exiled in England is taken as illustrative of processes typical of exiled activism. The case study draws on primary and secondary sources including a series of biographical interviews with exiled activists. The analysis compares activism in Egypt with exiled activism in England using the participants’ critical self-reflections to explain the mechanisms mediating the changes. Contrary to reasonable expectations that exile is a spontaneous response to a change in political context, the conditions for exile predate banishment and lie within the institutions of dictatorship which decertify activism. Decertification continues throughout the exile process as fear of repression becomes internalized within the movement. Within the sanctuary of the host country, a process of brokerage counteracts decertification expanding and modifying the exile repertoire.

KW - Social movements

KW - exile

KW - rumour

KW - decertification

KW - contentious politics

KW - Arab Spring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062470818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14747731.2019.1586116

DO - 10.1080/14747731.2019.1586116

M3 - Article

ER -