Root depth distribution and the diversity-productivity relationship in a long-term grassland experiment

Kevin Mueller, David Tilman, Dario Fornara, Sarah Hobbie

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    235 Citations (Scopus)
    216 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The relationship between plant diversity and productivity in grasslands could depend, partly, on how diversity affects vertical distributions of root biomass in soil; yet, no prior study has evaluated the links among diversity, root depth distributions, and productivity in a long-term experiment. We use data from a 12-year experiment to ask how plant species richness and composition influenced both observed and expected root depth distributions of plant communities. Expected root depth distributions were based on the abundance of species in each community and two traits of species that were measured in monocultures: root depth distributions and root to shoot ratios. The observed proportion of deep root biomass increased more than expected with species richness and was positively correlated with aboveground productivity. Indeed, the proportion of deep root biomass explained variation in productivity even after accounting for legume presence/abundance, and greater nitrogen availability in diverse plots. Diverse plots had root depth distributions that were twice as deep as expected from their species composition and corresponding monoculture traits, partly due to interactions between C4 grasses and legumes. These results suggest the productivity of diverse plant communities was partly dependent on belowground plant interactions that caused roots to be distributed more deeply in soil.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)787-793
    JournalEcology
    Volume94
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 5 Jun 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Root depth distribution and the diversity-productivity relationship in a long-term grassland experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this