Risks to mental health patients discharged into the community

S Kelly, Hugh McKenna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The advances in pharmacological and psychosocial treatments in the 1950s and 1960s facilitated the movement of care for increasing numbers of mentally ill people from the institutions to the community. This represented a radical change in mental health strategy and practice and has brought with it new sets of risks. Due to inherent stigmatisation and some well publicised cases of violence and murder, there is a perceived risk to the public from community-based mentally ill people. The findings of many studies have illustrated this and have led to the isolation and rejection of large numbers of people who have mental health problems. This has increased the risk to mentally ill people of victimisation and harassment from members of the public. Kelly and McKenna (1997) have shown that this takes many forms and occurs within and outside the home. Most worrying these latter risks can increase the former where some mentally ill people carry weapons to protect themselves. This in turn can increase public fear and raise stigmatisation. Furthermore, the lack of support and belonging can increase the risk of self-harm among the mentally ill. A more general risk is that for many deinstitutionalisation simply means transinstitutionalisation where incarceration in large mental hospitals is being replaced by incarceration within community based houses and flats. To assuage these risks mentally ill people still require social support and protection. The asylum the place may have disappeared but asylum the function is still required.
LanguageEnglish
Pages377-385
JournalHEALTH RISK & SOCIETY
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2004

Fingerprint

mental health
community
stigmatization
mental hospital
weapon
victimization
homicide
social support
social isolation
violence
anxiety
lack

Cite this

@article{fbf339c8d88b4a088f96c4eb26d57f6c,
title = "Risks to mental health patients discharged into the community",
abstract = "The advances in pharmacological and psychosocial treatments in the 1950s and 1960s facilitated the movement of care for increasing numbers of mentally ill people from the institutions to the community. This represented a radical change in mental health strategy and practice and has brought with it new sets of risks. Due to inherent stigmatisation and some well publicised cases of violence and murder, there is a perceived risk to the public from community-based mentally ill people. The findings of many studies have illustrated this and have led to the isolation and rejection of large numbers of people who have mental health problems. This has increased the risk to mentally ill people of victimisation and harassment from members of the public. Kelly and McKenna (1997) have shown that this takes many forms and occurs within and outside the home. Most worrying these latter risks can increase the former where some mentally ill people carry weapons to protect themselves. This in turn can increase public fear and raise stigmatisation. Furthermore, the lack of support and belonging can increase the risk of self-harm among the mentally ill. A more general risk is that for many deinstitutionalisation simply means transinstitutionalisation where incarceration in large mental hospitals is being replaced by incarceration within community based houses and flats. To assuage these risks mentally ill people still require social support and protection. The asylum the place may have disappeared but asylum the function is still required.",
author = "S Kelly and Hugh McKenna",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1080/13698570412331323252",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "377--385",
journal = "Health, Risk and Society",
issn = "1369-8575",
number = "4",

}

Risks to mental health patients discharged into the community. / Kelly, S; McKenna, Hugh.

In: HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY, Vol. 6, No. 4, 12.2004, p. 377-385.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risks to mental health patients discharged into the community

AU - Kelly, S

AU - McKenna, Hugh

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - The advances in pharmacological and psychosocial treatments in the 1950s and 1960s facilitated the movement of care for increasing numbers of mentally ill people from the institutions to the community. This represented a radical change in mental health strategy and practice and has brought with it new sets of risks. Due to inherent stigmatisation and some well publicised cases of violence and murder, there is a perceived risk to the public from community-based mentally ill people. The findings of many studies have illustrated this and have led to the isolation and rejection of large numbers of people who have mental health problems. This has increased the risk to mentally ill people of victimisation and harassment from members of the public. Kelly and McKenna (1997) have shown that this takes many forms and occurs within and outside the home. Most worrying these latter risks can increase the former where some mentally ill people carry weapons to protect themselves. This in turn can increase public fear and raise stigmatisation. Furthermore, the lack of support and belonging can increase the risk of self-harm among the mentally ill. A more general risk is that for many deinstitutionalisation simply means transinstitutionalisation where incarceration in large mental hospitals is being replaced by incarceration within community based houses and flats. To assuage these risks mentally ill people still require social support and protection. The asylum the place may have disappeared but asylum the function is still required.

AB - The advances in pharmacological and psychosocial treatments in the 1950s and 1960s facilitated the movement of care for increasing numbers of mentally ill people from the institutions to the community. This represented a radical change in mental health strategy and practice and has brought with it new sets of risks. Due to inherent stigmatisation and some well publicised cases of violence and murder, there is a perceived risk to the public from community-based mentally ill people. The findings of many studies have illustrated this and have led to the isolation and rejection of large numbers of people who have mental health problems. This has increased the risk to mentally ill people of victimisation and harassment from members of the public. Kelly and McKenna (1997) have shown that this takes many forms and occurs within and outside the home. Most worrying these latter risks can increase the former where some mentally ill people carry weapons to protect themselves. This in turn can increase public fear and raise stigmatisation. Furthermore, the lack of support and belonging can increase the risk of self-harm among the mentally ill. A more general risk is that for many deinstitutionalisation simply means transinstitutionalisation where incarceration in large mental hospitals is being replaced by incarceration within community based houses and flats. To assuage these risks mentally ill people still require social support and protection. The asylum the place may have disappeared but asylum the function is still required.

U2 - 10.1080/13698570412331323252

DO - 10.1080/13698570412331323252

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 377

EP - 385

JO - Health, Risk and Society

T2 - Health, Risk and Society

JF - Health, Risk and Society

SN - 1369-8575

IS - 4

ER -