Risk communication in dementia care: Professional perspectives on consequences, likelihood, words and numbers

Mabel Stevenson, Brian Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Communicating effectively about risk is fundamental to professionals addressing critical issues with clients and families, and to informed decision making. Using a grounded theory approach, this qualitative study explored how risk is conceptualised and communicated in dementia care. Data was gathered across five focus groups (thirty-five health and social care professionals) covering concepts and perspectives on verbal, numeric and visual forms of communicating risk. Risks were primarily conceptualised as consequences (positive and negative) rather than as likelihood, and related to a wide range of domains. Perceptions were influenced by sociocultural factors including risk-assessment mechanisms and wider discourse relating to positive risk-taking. The language of probability was used in a non-quantified, subjective manner. While professionals routinely received quantitative information, they did not typically communicate using numeric expressions. Verbal expressions of likelihood were widely preferred to numeric. When risks were presented in numeric formats, frequency presentation was seen as more comprehensible than percentages. Several participants saw potential in visual forms of risk communication. Bar charts were generally favoured over icon arrays as more easily understood. Good practice examples for risk communication were identified. This study provides pointers towards further research to support optimal risk communication in the complex domain of community care.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1940-1958
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume47
Issue number7
Early online date9 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

risk communication
dementia
Dementia
Communication
sociocultural factors
grounded theory
risk assessment
best practice
Risk-Taking
Focus Groups
decision making
Decision Making
Language
discourse
language
health
Delivery of Health Care
community
Group
Research

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • risk
  • communication
  • decision making
  • dementia care.

Cite this

@article{06b655c0a28d4f73a538ef06d5d4824d,
title = "Risk communication in dementia care: Professional perspectives on consequences, likelihood, words and numbers",
abstract = "Communicating effectively about risk is fundamental to professionals addressing critical issues with clients and families, and to informed decision making. Using a grounded theory approach, this qualitative study explored how risk is conceptualised and communicated in dementia care. Data was gathered across five focus groups (thirty-five health and social care professionals) covering concepts and perspectives on verbal, numeric and visual forms of communicating risk. Risks were primarily conceptualised as consequences (positive and negative) rather than as likelihood, and related to a wide range of domains. Perceptions were influenced by sociocultural factors including risk-assessment mechanisms and wider discourse relating to positive risk-taking. The language of probability was used in a non-quantified, subjective manner. While professionals routinely received quantitative information, they did not typically communicate using numeric expressions. Verbal expressions of likelihood were widely preferred to numeric. When risks were presented in numeric formats, frequency presentation was seen as more comprehensible than percentages. Several participants saw potential in visual forms of risk communication. Bar charts were generally favoured over icon arrays as more easily understood. Good practice examples for risk communication were identified. This study provides pointers towards further research to support optimal risk communication in the complex domain of community care.",
keywords = "Assessment, risk, communication, decision making, dementia care.",
author = "Mabel Stevenson and Brian Taylor",
note = "Duplicate item (11583360/36845) is compliant in UIR; evidence uploaded to 'Other files'. Duplicates merged on 23/89/2019 due to email from Brian Taylor on 23/9/2019",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1093/bjsw/bcw161",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "1940--1958",
journal = "British Journal of Social Work",
issn = "0045-3102",
number = "7",

}

Risk communication in dementia care: Professional perspectives on consequences, likelihood, words and numbers. / Stevenson, Mabel; Taylor, Brian.

In: British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 47, No. 7, 31.10.2017, p. 1940-1958.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk communication in dementia care: Professional perspectives on consequences, likelihood, words and numbers

AU - Stevenson, Mabel

AU - Taylor, Brian

N1 - Duplicate item (11583360/36845) is compliant in UIR; evidence uploaded to 'Other files'. Duplicates merged on 23/89/2019 due to email from Brian Taylor on 23/9/2019

PY - 2017/10/31

Y1 - 2017/10/31

N2 - Communicating effectively about risk is fundamental to professionals addressing critical issues with clients and families, and to informed decision making. Using a grounded theory approach, this qualitative study explored how risk is conceptualised and communicated in dementia care. Data was gathered across five focus groups (thirty-five health and social care professionals) covering concepts and perspectives on verbal, numeric and visual forms of communicating risk. Risks were primarily conceptualised as consequences (positive and negative) rather than as likelihood, and related to a wide range of domains. Perceptions were influenced by sociocultural factors including risk-assessment mechanisms and wider discourse relating to positive risk-taking. The language of probability was used in a non-quantified, subjective manner. While professionals routinely received quantitative information, they did not typically communicate using numeric expressions. Verbal expressions of likelihood were widely preferred to numeric. When risks were presented in numeric formats, frequency presentation was seen as more comprehensible than percentages. Several participants saw potential in visual forms of risk communication. Bar charts were generally favoured over icon arrays as more easily understood. Good practice examples for risk communication were identified. This study provides pointers towards further research to support optimal risk communication in the complex domain of community care.

AB - Communicating effectively about risk is fundamental to professionals addressing critical issues with clients and families, and to informed decision making. Using a grounded theory approach, this qualitative study explored how risk is conceptualised and communicated in dementia care. Data was gathered across five focus groups (thirty-five health and social care professionals) covering concepts and perspectives on verbal, numeric and visual forms of communicating risk. Risks were primarily conceptualised as consequences (positive and negative) rather than as likelihood, and related to a wide range of domains. Perceptions were influenced by sociocultural factors including risk-assessment mechanisms and wider discourse relating to positive risk-taking. The language of probability was used in a non-quantified, subjective manner. While professionals routinely received quantitative information, they did not typically communicate using numeric expressions. Verbal expressions of likelihood were widely preferred to numeric. When risks were presented in numeric formats, frequency presentation was seen as more comprehensible than percentages. Several participants saw potential in visual forms of risk communication. Bar charts were generally favoured over icon arrays as more easily understood. Good practice examples for risk communication were identified. This study provides pointers towards further research to support optimal risk communication in the complex domain of community care.

KW - Assessment

KW - risk

KW - communication

KW - decision making

KW - dementia care.

U2 - 10.1093/bjsw/bcw161

DO - 10.1093/bjsw/bcw161

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 1940

EP - 1958

JO - British Journal of Social Work

T2 - British Journal of Social Work

JF - British Journal of Social Work

SN - 0045-3102

IS - 7

ER -