Abstract
Background
Prevention of progression into type 2 diabetes (T2D) in patients with prediabetes is a key goal of obesity management. In SURMOUNT-5, once weekly tirzepatide at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD 10 mg or 15 mg) compared with semaglutide (MTD 1.7 mg or 2.4 mg) resulted in significantly greater body weight reduction in adults living with obesity without T2D.
Purpose
Assess changes in glycemia outcomes with tirzepatide (MTD 10 mg or 15 mg) compared with semaglutide (MTD 1.7 mg or 2.4 mg) in participants with obesity and prediabetes from SURMOUNT-5.
Methods
Participants (N = 425) with baseline prediabetes, defined as having ≥ 1 fasting lab-based value of either FSG 100–125 mg/dL or HbA1c 5.7–6.4%, were included in this analysis. Change from baseline in HbA1c, proportion of participants achieving normoglycemia (i.e., HbA1c < 5.7% and FSG < 100 mg/dL), percent change from baseline in body weight, fasting insulin, estimates of insulin sensitivity (HOMA2-IR), and proportion of participants achieving body weight reduction thresholds (≥ 10% to ≥ 30%) at Week 72 were assessed using MMRM or logistic regression for categorical measures using the efficacy analysis set.
Results
Mean baseline age was 47 years, 63% were female, BMI was 40 kg/m2, and HbA1c was 5.86%. At Week 72, mean HbA1c reduction was significantly greater with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (-0.60% vs -0.48%; estimated treatment difference [ETD; 95% CI] -0.12% [−0.18, −0.06]; p < 0.001). A greater proportion of tirzepatide-treated participants reverted to normoglycemia (89.9%) vs semaglutide (76.2%). Mean percent body weight reduction was significantly greater with tirzepatide (−21.5% vs -14.5%; ETD −7.1% [−9.1, −5.0]; p < 0.001). Greater improvements in fasting insulin and HOMA2-IR were observed with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
In this post hoc analysis of SURMOUNT-5, a greater proportion of tirzepatide-treated participants with obesity and prediabetes at baseline reverted to normoglycemia compared with semaglutide. Greater improvements in glycemia, estimates of insulin sensitivity and body weight were also observed with tirzepatide.
Prevention of progression into type 2 diabetes (T2D) in patients with prediabetes is a key goal of obesity management. In SURMOUNT-5, once weekly tirzepatide at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD 10 mg or 15 mg) compared with semaglutide (MTD 1.7 mg or 2.4 mg) resulted in significantly greater body weight reduction in adults living with obesity without T2D.
Purpose
Assess changes in glycemia outcomes with tirzepatide (MTD 10 mg or 15 mg) compared with semaglutide (MTD 1.7 mg or 2.4 mg) in participants with obesity and prediabetes from SURMOUNT-5.
Methods
Participants (N = 425) with baseline prediabetes, defined as having ≥ 1 fasting lab-based value of either FSG 100–125 mg/dL or HbA1c 5.7–6.4%, were included in this analysis. Change from baseline in HbA1c, proportion of participants achieving normoglycemia (i.e., HbA1c < 5.7% and FSG < 100 mg/dL), percent change from baseline in body weight, fasting insulin, estimates of insulin sensitivity (HOMA2-IR), and proportion of participants achieving body weight reduction thresholds (≥ 10% to ≥ 30%) at Week 72 were assessed using MMRM or logistic regression for categorical measures using the efficacy analysis set.
Results
Mean baseline age was 47 years, 63% were female, BMI was 40 kg/m2, and HbA1c was 5.86%. At Week 72, mean HbA1c reduction was significantly greater with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (-0.60% vs -0.48%; estimated treatment difference [ETD; 95% CI] -0.12% [−0.18, −0.06]; p < 0.001). A greater proportion of tirzepatide-treated participants reverted to normoglycemia (89.9%) vs semaglutide (76.2%). Mean percent body weight reduction was significantly greater with tirzepatide (−21.5% vs -14.5%; ETD −7.1% [−9.1, −5.0]; p < 0.001). Greater improvements in fasting insulin and HOMA2-IR were observed with tirzepatide vs semaglutide (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
In this post hoc analysis of SURMOUNT-5, a greater proportion of tirzepatide-treated participants with obesity and prediabetes at baseline reverted to normoglycemia compared with semaglutide. Greater improvements in glycemia, estimates of insulin sensitivity and body weight were also observed with tirzepatide.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Endocrinological Investigation |
| Early online date | 20 Apr 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 20 Apr 2026 |
Bibliographical note
© The Author(s) 2026Data Availability Statement
Lilly provides access to all individual participant data collected during the trial, after anonymization, with the exception of pharmacokinetic or genetic data. Data are available to request 6 months after the indication studied has been approved in the US and EU and after primary publication acceptance, whichever is later. No expiration date of data requests is currently set once data are made available. Access is provided after a proposal has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose and after receipt of a signed data sharing agreement. Data and documents, including the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, clinical study report, blank or annotated case report forms, will be provided in a secure data sharing environment. For details on submitting a request, see the instructions provided at www.vivli.org.Funding
This work is supported by Eli Lilly and Company.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Tirzepatide
- Prediabetes
- SURMOUNT-5
- Semaglutide
- Clinical trial
- Obesity
- Post hoc analysis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reversion to normoglycemia with tirzepatide vs semaglutide in participants with obesity and prediabetes: a post hoc analysis of SURMOUNT-5'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver