Retreat of the Antarctic Ice Sheet During the Last Interglaciation and Implications for Future Change

N. R. Golledge; P. U. Clark; F. He; A. Dutton; C. S. M. Turney; C. J. Fogwill; T. R. Naish; R. H. Levy; R. M. McKay; D. P. Lowry; N. A. N. Bertler; G. B. Dunbar; A. E. Carlson

doi:10.1029/2021gl094513

Retreat of the Antarctic Ice Sheet During the Last Interglaciation and Implications for Future Change

N. R. Golledge
, P. U. Clark
, F. He
, A. Dutton
, C. S. M. Turney
, C. J. Fogwill
, T. R. Naish
, R. H. Levy
, R. M. McKay
, D. P. Lowry
, N. A. N. Bertler
, G. B. Dunbar
, A. E. Carlson

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

47 Citations (Scopus)

285 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) response to past warming consistent with the 1.5–2°C “safe limit” of the United Nations Paris Agreement is currently not well known. Empirical evidence from the most recent comparable period, the Last Interglaciation, is sparse, and transient ice-sheet experiments are few and inconsistent. Here, we present new, transient, GCM-forced ice-sheet simulations validated against proxy reconstructions. This is the first time such an evaluation has been attempted. Our empirically constrained simulations indicate that the AIS contributed 4 m to global mean sea level by 126 ka BP, with ice lost primarily from the Amundsen, but not Ross or Weddell Sea, sectors. We resolve the conflict between previous work and show that the AIS thinned in the Wilkes Subglacial Basin but did not retreat. We also find that the West AIS may be predisposed to future collapse even in the absence of further environmental change, consistent with previous studies.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-11
Number of pages	11
Journal	Geophysical Research Letters
Volume	48
Issue number	17
Early online date	29 Aug 2021
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1029/2021gl094513
Publication status	Published (in print/issue) - 8 Sept 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
NRG acknowledges funding from Royal Society of New Zealand contract VUW‐1501. Simulations on which this work is based were funded by US National Science Foundation (NSF) through grant numbers AGS‐1503032 (to PUC and AEC), AGS‐1502990 (to FH), 1559040 (to AD), and OPP‐1443437 (to AEC). FH gratefully acknowledges the NOAA Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral Fellowship program, administered by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. High‐performance computing support from Yellowstone ( http://n2t.net/ark:/85065/d7wd3xhc ) and Cheyenne ( http://www.doi.org/10.5065/D6RX99HX ) was provided by NCAR's Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, sponsored by the NSF. This research used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under contract number DE‐AC05‐00OR22725. AD gratefully acknowledges the U.S. Fulbright Scholar Program. CSMT and CJF acknowledge support from the Australian Research Council (ARC), including Linkage Project (LP120200724) and Discovery Project DP210103621, supported by Antarctic Logistics and Expeditions. NRG, TRN, RHL, RMM, DPL, NANB, and GBD acknowledge support from Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment contracts RTUV1705 (NZSeaRise) and ANTA1801 (Antarctic Science Platform). PISM is supported by NASA grant numbers NNX13AM16G and NNX13AK27G.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.

Funding

Funding Information: NRG acknowledges funding from Royal Society of New Zealand contract VUW‐1501. Simulations on which this work is based were funded by US National Science Foundation (NSF) through grant numbers AGS‐1503032 (to PUC and AEC), AGS‐1502990 (to FH), 1559040 (to AD), and OPP‐1443437 (to AEC). FH gratefully acknowledges the NOAA Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral Fellowship program, administered by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. High‐performance computing support from Yellowstone ( http://n2t.net/ark:/85065/d7wd3xhc ) and Cheyenne ( http://www.doi.org/10.5065/D6RX99HX ) was provided by NCAR's Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, sponsored by the NSF. This research used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under contract number DE‐AC05‐00OR22725. AD gratefully acknowledges the U.S. Fulbright Scholar Program. CSMT and CJF acknowledge support from the Australian Research Council (ARC), including Linkage Project (LP120200724) and Discovery Project DP210103621, supported by Antarctic Logistics and Expeditions. NRG, TRN, RHL, RMM, DPL, NANB, and GBD acknowledge support from Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment contracts RTUV1705 (NZSeaRise) and ANTA1801 (Antarctic Science Platform). PISM is supported by NASA grant numbers NNX13AM16G and NNX13AK27G. Publisher Copyright: © 2021. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Geophysics
sea-level rise
palaeoclimate
climate change

Access to Document

10.1029/2021gl094513

Retreat of the Antarctic Ice SheetFinal published version, 2.78 MB

Cite this

Golledge, N. R., Clark, P. U., He, F., Dutton, A., Turney, C. S. M., Fogwill, C. J., Naish, T. R., Levy, R. H., McKay, R. M., Lowry, D. P., Bertler, N. A. N., Dunbar, G. B., & Carlson, A. E. (2021). Retreat of the Antarctic Ice Sheet During the Last Interglaciation and Implications for Future Change. Geophysical Research Letters, 48(17), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021gl094513

@article{f4df8ca7f73044a0b54f8c2a812de127,

title = "Retreat of the Antarctic Ice Sheet During the Last Interglaciation and Implications for Future Change",

abstract = "The Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) response to past warming consistent with the 1.5–2°C “safe limit” of the United Nations Paris Agreement is currently not well known. Empirical evidence from the most recent comparable period, the Last Interglaciation, is sparse, and transient ice-sheet experiments are few and inconsistent. Here, we present new, transient, GCM-forced ice-sheet simulations validated against proxy reconstructions. This is the first time such an evaluation has been attempted. Our empirically constrained simulations indicate that the AIS contributed 4 m to global mean sea level by 126 ka BP, with ice lost primarily from the Amundsen, but not Ross or Weddell Sea, sectors. We resolve the conflict between previous work and show that the AIS thinned in the Wilkes Subglacial Basin but did not retreat. We also find that the West AIS may be predisposed to future collapse even in the absence of further environmental change, consistent with previous studies.",

keywords = "General Earth and Planetary Sciences, Geophysics, sea-level rise, palaeoclimate, climate change",

author = "Golledge, \{N. R.\} and Clark, \{P. U.\} and F. He and A. Dutton and Turney, \{C. S. M.\} and Fogwill, \{C. J.\} and Naish, \{T. R.\} and Levy, \{R. H.\} and McKay, \{R. M.\} and Lowry, \{D. P.\} and Bertler, \{N. A. N.\} and Dunbar, \{G. B.\} and Carlson, \{A. E.\}",

note = "Funding Information: NRG acknowledges funding from Royal Society of New Zealand contract VUW‐1501. Simulations on which this work is based were funded by US National Science Foundation (NSF) through grant numbers AGS‐1503032 (to PUC and AEC), AGS‐1502990 (to FH), 1559040 (to AD), and OPP‐1443437 (to AEC). FH gratefully acknowledges the NOAA Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral Fellowship program, administered by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. High‐performance computing support from Yellowstone ( http://n2t.net/ark:/85065/d7wd3xhc ) and Cheyenne ( http://www.doi.org/10.5065/D6RX99HX ) was provided by NCAR's Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, sponsored by the NSF. This research used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under contract number DE‐AC05‐00OR22725. AD gratefully acknowledges the U.S. Fulbright Scholar Program. CSMT and CJF acknowledge support from the Australian Research Council (ARC), including Linkage Project (LP120200724) and Discovery Project DP210103621, supported by Antarctic Logistics and Expeditions. NRG, TRN, RHL, RMM, DPL, NANB, and GBD acknowledge support from Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment contracts RTUV1705 (NZSeaRise) and ANTA1801 (Antarctic Science Platform). PISM is supported by NASA grant numbers NNX13AM16G and NNX13AK27G. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.",

year = "2021",

month = sep,

day = "8",

doi = "10.1029/2021gl094513",

language = "English",

volume = "48",

pages = "1--11",

journal = "Geophysical Research Letters",

issn = "0094-8276",

publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",

number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retreat of the Antarctic Ice Sheet During the Last Interglaciation and Implications for Future Change

AU - Golledge, N. R.

AU - Clark, P. U.

AU - He, F.

AU - Dutton, A.

AU - Turney, C. S. M.

AU - Fogwill, C. J.

AU - Naish, T. R.

AU - Levy, R. H.

AU - McKay, R. M.

AU - Lowry, D. P.

AU - Bertler, N. A. N.

AU - Dunbar, G. B.

AU - Carlson, A. E.

N1 - Funding Information: NRG acknowledges funding from Royal Society of New Zealand contract VUW‐1501. Simulations on which this work is based were funded by US National Science Foundation (NSF) through grant numbers AGS‐1503032 (to PUC and AEC), AGS‐1502990 (to FH), 1559040 (to AD), and OPP‐1443437 (to AEC). FH gratefully acknowledges the NOAA Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral Fellowship program, administered by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. High‐performance computing support from Yellowstone ( http://n2t.net/ark:/85065/d7wd3xhc ) and Cheyenne ( http://www.doi.org/10.5065/D6RX99HX ) was provided by NCAR's Computational and Information Systems Laboratory, sponsored by the NSF. This research used resources of the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under contract number DE‐AC05‐00OR22725. AD gratefully acknowledges the U.S. Fulbright Scholar Program. CSMT and CJF acknowledge support from the Australian Research Council (ARC), including Linkage Project (LP120200724) and Discovery Project DP210103621, supported by Antarctic Logistics and Expeditions. NRG, TRN, RHL, RMM, DPL, NANB, and GBD acknowledge support from Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment contracts RTUV1705 (NZSeaRise) and ANTA1801 (Antarctic Science Platform). PISM is supported by NASA grant numbers NNX13AM16G and NNX13AK27G. Publisher Copyright: © 2021. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.

PY - 2021/9/8

Y1 - 2021/9/8

N2 - The Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) response to past warming consistent with the 1.5–2°C “safe limit” of the United Nations Paris Agreement is currently not well known. Empirical evidence from the most recent comparable period, the Last Interglaciation, is sparse, and transient ice-sheet experiments are few and inconsistent. Here, we present new, transient, GCM-forced ice-sheet simulations validated against proxy reconstructions. This is the first time such an evaluation has been attempted. Our empirically constrained simulations indicate that the AIS contributed 4 m to global mean sea level by 126 ka BP, with ice lost primarily from the Amundsen, but not Ross or Weddell Sea, sectors. We resolve the conflict between previous work and show that the AIS thinned in the Wilkes Subglacial Basin but did not retreat. We also find that the West AIS may be predisposed to future collapse even in the absence of further environmental change, consistent with previous studies.

AB - The Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) response to past warming consistent with the 1.5–2°C “safe limit” of the United Nations Paris Agreement is currently not well known. Empirical evidence from the most recent comparable period, the Last Interglaciation, is sparse, and transient ice-sheet experiments are few and inconsistent. Here, we present new, transient, GCM-forced ice-sheet simulations validated against proxy reconstructions. This is the first time such an evaluation has been attempted. Our empirically constrained simulations indicate that the AIS contributed 4 m to global mean sea level by 126 ka BP, with ice lost primarily from the Amundsen, but not Ross or Weddell Sea, sectors. We resolve the conflict between previous work and show that the AIS thinned in the Wilkes Subglacial Basin but did not retreat. We also find that the West AIS may be predisposed to future collapse even in the absence of further environmental change, consistent with previous studies.

KW - General Earth and Planetary Sciences

KW - Geophysics

KW - sea-level rise

KW - palaeoclimate

KW - climate change

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85114723658

U2 - 10.1029/2021gl094513

DO - 10.1029/2021gl094513

M3 - Article

SN - 0094-8276

VL - 48

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - Geophysical Research Letters

JF - Geophysical Research Letters

IS - 17

ER -

Retreat of the Antarctic Ice Sheet During the Last Interglaciation and Implications for Future Change

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Funding

UN SDGs

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this