Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Abstract

Co-design plays a pivotal role in architectural design and urban planning for the green transition, facilitating collaboration among designers and stakeholders to create contextually appropriate solutions. This study examines the balance between stakeholder input and designer agency within co-design practices aimed at addressing the complex challenges posed by the green transition. Looking at how designers mindsets and methods are influenced by co-design, this study is carried out by analysing two contrasting case studies from the Future Island-Island project: Field Operations, an immersive residential on Rathlin Island, and DesignLink, a structured design sprint with organisational partners. Employing the terminologies of autogenic (designer-led) and allogenic design (stakeholder-led), the research critically explores how these modalities influence design outcomes and designers themselves. Field Operations exemplifies a more allogenic approach characterised by collaborative brief development through local immersion, while DesignLink primarily illustrates an autogenic process where predefined objectives guided creative synthesis. The study reveals that effective co-design requires oscillation between these approaches, underscoring the necessity for designers to harness both community insights while ensuring their own creative agency. The findings in this study advocate for a refined co-design framework that optimally integrates stakeholder contributions without compromising the integrity and coherence of the design process, emphasising the importance of contextual sensitivity, innovation, and timely decision-making in addressing complex societal challenges such as the green transition.
Original languageEnglish
Article number92
Number of pages29
JournalArchitecture
Volume5
Issue number4
Early online date9 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 30 Dec 2025
EventRathlin Residential: WP3 Field Operations - Rathlin Island, Northern Ireland
Duration: 14 Oct 202418 Oct 2024

Bibliographical note

Author Contributions: Conceptualisation, R.J.M., G.K., S.C., E.C., A.G., and A.D.; methodology, R.J.M., G.K., S.C., and N.F.; formal analysis, R.J.M., G.K., S.C.; writing—original draft preparation, R.J.M.; writing—review and editing, R.J.M., S.C., G.K., E.C., N.F., S.G., C.M., L.K.P., and A.M; visu-alisation, R.J.M.; supervision, G.K.; project administration, G.K. and S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request due to privacy restrictions—The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author, as they are subject to privacy restrictions.

Funding

We are grateful to the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) for their funding of the Future Island-Island project (R1573NBE).

FundersFunder number
Arts and Humanities Research Council
R1573NBE

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
      SDG 1 No Poverty
    2. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
    3. SDG 4 - Quality Education
      SDG 4 Quality Education
    4. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
      SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
    5. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
      SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
    6. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
      SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
    7. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
      SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    8. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
      SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
    9. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
      SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
    10. SDG 13 - Climate Action
      SDG 13 Climate Action
    11. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    12. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
      SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

    Keywords

    • co-design
    • resilience
    • design agency
    • green transition
    • design methodology
    • stakeholder engagement

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking Co-Design for the Green Transition: Balancing Stakeholder Input and Designer Agency'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this